Central District of California • 5:26-cv-01567

#1

Mar 31, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-41880029 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Dzhakhar Aslambekov. (Attorney Magomed Esendirov added to party Dzhakhar Aslambekov(pty:pet))(Esendirov, Magomed) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#2

Mar 31, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Dzhakhar Aslambekov. (Esendirov, Magomed) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#3

Mar 31, 2026

EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Immediate release from ICE custody filed by Petitioner Dzhakhar Aslambekov. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Memorandum, # 3 Proposed TRO, # 4 Proposed Order to show cause why...) (Esendirov, Magomed) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

#4

Apr 01, 2026

NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) (Entered: 04/01/2026)

#5

Apr 01, 2026

ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:26-cv-01567-AB-RAO. (aco) (Entered: 04/01/2026)

#6

Apr 03, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On Tuesday, March 31 2026, Petitioner Dzhakhar Aslambekov (Petitioner) filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Petition, Dkt. No. 1 ) challenging his ongoing civil immigration detention at Desert View Facility in Adelanto, California. Pet. 1. That same day, Petitioner also filed an Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO Application, Dkt. No. 3 ) seeking his release, among other relief. Counsels declaration states that he gave Respondents counsel notice of the Petition and the TRO Application. Pursuant to Appendix C to the Local Civil Rules, Agreement on Acceptance of Service, at case opening, the Petition and Application were sent to the Notice Only email account designated by the U.S. Attorneys Office. This case was reassigned to this Court on April 1, 2026. This Courts standing orders provide that responses to ex parte and TRO applications must be filed within 48 hours after service. However, the Court ORDERS that Respondents must respond to the TRO Application by Monday, April 6, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (evc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/03/2026)

Apr 03, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#7

Apr 06, 2026

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

#8

Apr 06, 2026

Response

#9

Apr 06, 2026

Reply (Motion related)

#10

Apr 08, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#11

Apr 09, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court CORRECTS its TRO (Dkt. No. 10 ) to ORDER as follows: The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Statement regarding Respondents compliance with the TRO by Friday April 10, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (evc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/09/2026)

Apr 09, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#12

Apr 10, 2026

Status Report

#13

Apr 14, 2026

Response

#14

Apr 17, 2026

Reply

#15

Apr 20, 2026

Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held AND Preliminary Injunction AND ~Util - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

#16

Apr 21, 2026

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: Respondents are directed to file a written statement as to why the Court should not enter a permanent injunction consistent with the Court's Order Granting Petitioner a Preliminary Injunction 15 . Specifically, in light of the Court's determination that the Petition is not mooted by Petitioner's release from immigration custody, Respondents are ordered to address why the Court should not issue a permanent injunction enjoining them from re-detaining Petitioner without notice of the reasons for revocation of his parole and a pre-deprivation hearing before a neutral immigration judge to determine whether detention is warranted. Respondents are ordered to file their response to this OSC by April 28, 2026. (RAO) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

Apr 21, 2026

Order