Northern District of Ohio • 1:26-cv-00744
Torres-Barbosa v. Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Detroit Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Active
Case Information
Filed: March 27, 2026
Assigned to:
Pamela Ann Barker
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
March 30, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 27, 2026
Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal ICE custody. Filing fee paid $5.00, receipt number AOHNDC-13596533. Filed by Jose Alexis Torres-Barbosa. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit - Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit - Notice EOIR) (Georgalas, Lauren) (Entered: 03/27/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241)
Mar 30, 2026
Remark re Service of Restricted Documents. Copy of non-doc Order with the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and exhibits emailed to the Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio on 3/30/2026. (P,K)
Mar 30, 2026
Order [non-document] The Court hereby ORDERS as follows. The Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of the Petition and its Exhibits, together with this Order, to the Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS Respondents to respond to the Petition by no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, i.e., by April 13, 2026. Petitioner may reply by no later than fourteen (14) days of the filing of Respondents' Response to the Petition, i.e., by no later than April 27, 2026. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/30/2026. (P,K)
Mar 30, 2026
Order
Mar 30, 2026
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay. (B,Ch)
Mar 30, 2026
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (B,Ch)
Mar 30, 2026
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/30/2026. (P,K)
Parties
Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Detroit Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Party
Torres-Barbosa
Party