Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-00528

OCHOA PENA v. NOEM

Completed

Case Information

Filed: March 25, 2026
Assigned to: Christy Chriswell Wiegand
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Completed: April 01, 2026
Last Activity: April 01, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 25, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $5, receipt number APAWDC-9456350), filed by DANIEL ANTONIO OCHOA PENA. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gibbs, Stephanie) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
Main Document: ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#2
Mar 26, 2026
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 3/26/2026. (bjw) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
Main Document: Case Management Order
#3
Mar 26, 2026
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DANIEL ANTONIO OCHOA PENA re 2 Case Management Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. Proof of Service) (Gibbs, Stephanie) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
Main Document: CERTIFICATE
Mar 26, 2026
Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand added. (bjr)
#4
Mar 27, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Hillary Weaver on behalf of PAMELA BONDI, TODD LYONS, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO, MICHAEL ROSE. (Weaver, Hillary) (Entered: 03/27/2026)
Main Document: NOTICE
#5
Mar 30, 2026
SCHEDULING ORDER. Response to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus due by 4/2/2026; Reply due 4/7/2026. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 3/30/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjw) (Entered: 03/30/2026)
#6
Mar 30, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PAMELA BONDI, TODD LYONS, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO, MICHAEL ROSE. (Weaver, Hillary) (Entered: 03/30/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
Mar 30, 2026
Order
#7
Apr 01, 2026
ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner, a noncitizen detained by Respondents at Moshannon Valley Processing Center, seeks, inter alia, immediate release from custody or, in the alternative, an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge. The parties agree that the issue before the Court is whether Petitioner is subject to discretionary detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1226(a) and therefore entitled to a bond hearing or mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b) and therefore not entitled to a bond hearing. Respondents rely on the BIA's decisions in Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. Dec. 216 (B.I.A. 2025) and/or Matter of Q. Li, 29 I. & N. Dec. 66 (B.I.A. 2025). The Court is mindful that several United States Courts of Appeals have ruled that noncitizens like Petitioner who have resided in the interior of the country for years are "applicants for admission" subject to mandatory detention. See Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi et al, 166 F.4th 494 (5th Cir. 2026); see also Herrera Avila v. Bondi, No. 25-3248 (8th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026); but see Castanon-Nava v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 161 F.4th 1048, 1060-62 (7th Cir. 2025) (holding that the government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its argument that § 1225(b) governs noncitizens already in the United States whom ICE detained in Chicago). Nonetheless, for the reasons set forth in this Court's prior decisions, the Court concludes that: Petitioner is not required to exhaust administrative remedies as doing so would be futile; and Petitioner is subject to discretionary detention pursuant to § 1226(a) and is therefore entitled to a bond hearing. See, e.g., Zhunio v. Warden et al., No. 3:26-CV-71-CCW, ECF No. 7 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2026) (Wiegand, J.) (noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection and resided continuously in the interior of the country thereafter subject to discretionary detention pursuant to § 1226(a)); Padilla Ventura v. Rose et al., No. 3:26-cv-65-CCW, ECF No. 13 (W.D. Pa. February 3, 2026) (Wiegand, J.) (same). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED IN PART, as follows: within seven days of this Order, Petitioner must receive an individualized bond hearing conducted by an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226. If Petitioner does not receive a bond hearing by that date, or if the immigration judge declines to conduct a bond hearing based on Matter of Yajure Hurtado, Respondents shall immediately release Petitioner from custody. Within seven days of the immigration judge's decision, the parties must file a joint notice on the docket advising the Court of the outcome of the bond hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED in all other respects. In particular, for the reasons set forth in this Court's prior decisions, the Court DENIES Petitioner's request for costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) because Respondents' position, while incorrect, was substantially justified. See Orellana Rivas v. Oddo et al., No. 3:26-cv-246-CCW, ECF No. 14 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2026) (Wiegand, J.). The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 4/1/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjw) (Entered: 04/01/2026)
Apr 01, 2026
Order Dismissing Case