Active
Case Information
Filed: March 25, 2026
Assigned to:
Richard Gaylore Stearns
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
April 10, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 25, 2026
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11633975 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Ting Zhang. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Release Notification), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Order of Supervision), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Notice of Revocation), # 4 Exhibit 4 (Congressional Report), # 5 Exhibit 5 (Rep. Roy Letter), # 6 Civil Cover Sheet, # 7 Category Form)(Ho, Thao) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Mar 25, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (NMC) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
#3
Mar 25, 2026
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered Concerning Service of Petition and Stay of Transfer or Removal. (JAM) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#4
Mar 25, 2026
Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and 3 Order mailed to Joseph D. McDonald, Antone Moniz, Pamela Bondi, Kristi L. Noem, David Wesling, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Todd M Lyons, on 3/25/2026. (JAM) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
Mar 25, 2026
Copy Mailed
Mar 25, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#5
Apr 01, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#6
Apr 01, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#7
Apr 02, 2026
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 6 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Any reply from petitioner is due no later than April 9, 2026. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 04/02/2026)
#8
Apr 02, 2026
Appear Pro Hac Vice
Main Document:
Appear Pro Hac Vice
#9
Apr 02, 2026
Appear Pro Hac Vice
Main Document:
Appear Pro Hac Vice
Apr 02, 2026
Order on Motion for Leave to Appear AND Order on Motion for Leave to Appear
Apr 02, 2026
Order
#11
Apr 09, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#12
Apr 09, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#13
Apr 09, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#14
Apr 10, 2026
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The February 10, 2016 Release Notice to petitioner Ting Zhang does not specify the basis for his release. In the absence of an indication that his release was premised on a finding that removal was not significantly likely in the reasonably foreseeable future (e.g., because the government had not been able to effect his removal), his release is seemingly governed by 8 C.F.R. § 241.4, which broadly authorizes ICE to re-detain a noncitizen where, as here, it determines that "[t]he purposes of release have been served" This finding does not, however, end the court's analysis. His release having been revoked, petitioner is now being detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6). In Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), the Supreme Court read an implicit limitation into § 1231(a)(6) that any post-removal period detention may not exceed the "period reasonably necessary to bring about that alien's removal from the United States." Id. at 689. Detention is only permissible "until it has been determined that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future." Id. Here, petitioner has, cumulatively, been detained for more than 380 days -- well beyond the six month presumptively reasonable period -- and nothing in the record indicates he is likely to be removed any time soon. At best, the government notes that it recently submitted a new request for travel documents to the Chinese government and that the Chinese government has granted at least some other requests in purportedly similar cases. But the government does not explain how these other cases are similar or why the grant of travel documents there makes a grant likely here. It also does not provide any timeline in which a grant is expected to happen, such that removal could be considered likely in the reasonably foreseeable future. The court accordingly ORDERS that ICE release petitioner from custody under the terms and conditions previously in effect, see Dkt # 1-2, by close of business on Monday, April 13, 2026. The government shall file a certification of compliance with the court's order by April 14, 2026.(RGS, law3) (Entered: 04/10/2026)
Apr 10, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm
Firm