District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-01243

Singh v. Baltasar

Completed

Case Information

Filed: March 24, 2026
Assigned to: Shane Kato Crews
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Completed: April 14, 2026
Last Activity: April 14, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 24, 2026
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10902472)Attorney Gurpreet Kaur added to party Ajmer Singh(pty:pet), filed by Ajmer Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 03/24/2026)
Main Document: APPLICATION
#2
Mar 24, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Ajmer Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 03/24/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Mar 24, 2026
NOTICE by Petitioner Ajmer Singh (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 03/24/2026)
Main Document: NOTICE
#4
Mar 24, 2026
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
#5
Mar 26, 2026
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (agarc, ) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
Main Document: Magistrate
#6
Mar 26, 2026
CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01243-SKC. (Text only entry.) (agarc, ) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
#7
Mar 26, 2026
ORDER Upon review of the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall SERVE Respondents with a copy of the Petition, TRO, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and by overnight mail, on or before April 2, 2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. With five days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the Petition and Motion and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition and Motion should not be granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Pursuant to the All Writs Act, and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/26/2026.Text Only Entry (skclc4) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
#8
Mar 26, 2026
CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re 7 Order,,,, by Petitioner Ajmer Singh. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
Main Document: CERTIFICATE
Mar 26, 2026
Order
#9
Apr 08, 2026
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew M. Soler on behalf of Juan Baltasar, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Markwayne MullinAttorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Juan Baltasar(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Pamela Bondi(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Todd Lyons(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res) (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document: NOTICE
#10
Apr 08, 2026
RESPONSE to 7 Order,,,, by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#11
Apr 09, 2026
REPLY to 10 Response by Petitioner Ajmer Singh. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 04/09/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#12
Apr 09, 2026
ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner's 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In much appreciated candor to the Court, Respondents acknowledge that this case is not materially different from a case this Court previously decided, Diallo v. Baltazar, No. 1:25-cv-3548-SKC, 2026 WL 237296, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan. 29, 2026). Dkt. 10, p.1. Accordingly, this Court adopts and incorporates its reasoning from Diallo in full.Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:1. Respondents shall immediately release Mr. Singh from detention without imposing an ankle monitor or any other condition not specifically imposed in writing by the immigration judge. See Batz Barreno v. Baltasar, No. 25-cv-03017-GPG-TPO, 2026 WL 120253, at *2 (D. Colo. Jan. 15, 2026) (concluding use of a GPS ankle monitor constitutes custody for the purposes of habeas corpus and due process);2. Respondents shall immediately release Mr. Singh from detention. However, if Mr. Singh resides outside of Colorado and is only in this state because Respondents transferred him here, Mr. Singh shall remain in Respondents temporary custody for the sole purpose of Respondents effectuating his return to his place of residence;3. If necessary, Respondents SHALL transport Mr. Singh back to his place of residence outside of Colorado, at their own expense, within 36 hours of the date and time of this Order; 4. To effectuate the purpose of this Court's Order and to allow Mr. Singh to return home, Respondents are also temporarily enjoined from detaining him under 8 U.S.C. § 1226 for a period of 14 days from the date he is released or returned to his state of residence; and5. Respondents shall file a status report within FIVE DAYS of Mr. Singh's immediate release or return to his state of residence to certify Respondents' compliance with this Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED as moot.SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/09/2026. Text Only Entry (skclc4) (Entered: 04/09/2026)
Apr 09, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
#13
Apr 14, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#14
Apr 14, 2026
ORDER: In light of the representations in the 13 Status Report filed by Respondents, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. Petitioner is awarded his costs pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. See Daley v. Ceja, 158 F.4th 1152 (10th Cir. Nov. 3, 2025); 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(1). By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/14/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
#15
Apr 14, 2026
Judgment
Main Document: Judgment
Apr 14, 2026
Order