Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-01008

#1

Mar 20, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Santos Elias Oxlaj Ixcoy. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

#2

Mar 20, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Santos Elias Oxlaj Ixcoy. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

#3

Mar 20, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/23/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

#4

Mar 20, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

#5

Mar 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/20/2026: Minute Order:The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The 2 motion for temporary restraining order appears to raise legal issues that the Court has previously addressed. See e.g., Crispin M.C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-CV-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026); J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01354-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3013328 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025); Lepe v. Andrews, 801 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2025). On or before March 24, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Crispin M.C. v. Noem, J.A.C.P. v. Wofford and Lepe v. Andrews and justify denying the motion, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Respondents shall state their position as to whether the 2 motion for temporary restraining order should be converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether they request a hearing on the 2 motion. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (gm) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

Mar 20, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Santos Elias Oxlaj Ixcoy. (Deputy Clerk OML)

Mar 20, 2026

Minute Order

Mar 20, 2026

Service by Mail

Mar 23, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order, served on Santos Elias Oxlaj Ixcoy. (Deputy Clerk VMG)

Mar 23, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Mar 24, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service