Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-00964
(HC) Ramirez-Calmo v. Warden, California City Correctional Center
Completed
Case Information
Filed: March 18, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: March 27, 2026
Last Activity:
March 27, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 18, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Nicolas Ramirez-Calmo. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Mar 18, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Nicolas Ramirez-Calmo. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Mar 18, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 4/20/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#4
Mar 18, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#5
Mar 18, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/18/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states he was detained on 10/17/2025, over 120 days before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the 1 Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 12:00 PM on 3/23/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 4/6/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk RAA) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Mar 18, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Nicolas Ramirez-Calmo. (Deputy Clerk RAA)
Mar 18, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Nicolas Ramirez-Calmo. (Deputy Clerk AJB)
Mar 18, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Mar 18, 2026
Service by Mail
Mar 18, 2026
RECEIPT number 17804 for $5.00 for filing fee from Nicolas Ramirez-Calmo. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
#6
Mar 23, 2026
Extension of Time
Main Document:
Extension of Time
#7
Mar 23, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/23/2026: Having considered Respondents' 6 Motion for an extension of time in which to respond to Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, the court hereby GRANTS Respondents' 6 Motion and DIRECTS Respondents to file their response to Petitioner's 2 Motion by 12:00 PM on 3/25/2026. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 03/23/2026)
Mar 23, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Extension of Time AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
Mar 23, 2026
Service by Mail
Mar 23, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 7, served on Nicolas Ramirez-Calmo. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
#8
Mar 25, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document:
Dismiss
#9
Mar 27, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document:
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#10
Mar 27, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
(HC) Ramirez-Calmo
Party
Warden, California City Correctional Center
Party