Eastern District of New York • 1:26-cv-01572

#1

Mar 17, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANYEDC-20013315, filed by FREDY EDUVIEL Arriaga Hernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (White, N.) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

#2

Mar 17, 2026

This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

Mar 17, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV)

Mar 17, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Mar 19, 2026

Scheduling Order

#3

Mar 20, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#4

Mar 20, 2026

Certificate of Service

#5

Mar 25, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

#6

Mar 25, 2026

Letter

Mar 26, 2026

Order to Show Cause (463)

Mar 26, 2026

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Respondents' letter 5 and Petitioner's response 6 thereto. Respondents informed the Court that, on March 20, 2026, Petitioner was released from custody from the Metropolitan Detention Center ("MDC"). And, in light of Petitioner's release, Respondents request 5 that the instant petition 1 for a writ of habeas corpus (the "Petition") be denied as moot and that this case be dismissed. In response, Petitioner argues that the instant Petition is not moot because he has been subject to electronic monitoring and is required to "present himself for a series of check-ins, including [] in -person check-ins and home visits." (ECF No. 6.) Respondents are directed to SHOW CAUSE, no later than March 27, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., why the Court should not construe Petitioner's electronic monitoring and check-in requirements as a form of detention. In addition, Respondents are directed to confirm, no later than March 27, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., whether Petitioner's detainment was effectuated pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225 U.S.C. or 8 U.S.C. § 1226, and whether their arguments related thereto are the same as those previously rejected by the Court when ruling on the petitions in Caivanagua Sanchez v. Genalo, et al., No. 26-cv-476 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2026), Estrada Alfaro v. Genalo, No. 26-cv-761 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2026), and Singh v. Genalo, No. 26-cv-937 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2026). Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 3/26/2026. (JAR)

#7

Mar 27, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

Apr 08, 2026

Status Conference

#8

Apr 09, 2026

Letter