Western District of New York • 6:26-cv-06298

Diallo v. Bausch

Active

Case Information

Filed: March 16, 2026
Assigned to: Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: March 17, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 16, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-5752749.), filed by Ibrahima Diallo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I-213, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zaiman, Grace) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
Main Document: PETITION
#2
Mar 17, 2026
TEXT ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ibrahima Diallo So that the petitioner can fully participate in these proceedings and maintain adequate access to legal counsel, the respondents are enjoined from transferring the petitioner to any district outside the Western District of New York. See Perez y Perez v. Noem, 2025 WL 1908284, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 13, 2025) (collecting cases). In Cabrera Martinez v. Marich, --- F.Supp.3d ---, 2025 WL 3771228 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 31, 2025), this Court held that detention of noncitizens who have remained in the country following expiration of parole is under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not section 1225. And in Mata Velasquez v. Kurzdorfer, 794 F. Supp. 3d 128 (W.D.N.Y. 2025), this Court concluded "that both common sense and the words of the statute require parole revocation to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis and that a decision to revoke parole must attend to the reasons an individual [noncitizen] received parole." Id. at 146 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). It appears that the holding of Cabrera Martinez or Mata Velasquez may apply to the petitioner in this case. Accordingly, the respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before 3/24/2026 why, in light of those decisions, (1) the petition in this case should not be granted, and (2) the Court should not either release the petitioner, see Mata Velasquez, 794 F. Supp. 3d at 154, or order that the petitioner receive a bond hearing at which the government bears the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk and at which the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, the petitioner's ability to pay, see Cabrera Martinez, 2025 WL 3771228, at *15. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 3/17/2026. (ZHM) (Entered: 03/17/2026)
Mar 17, 2026
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (DMK)
Mar 17, 2026
Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to chambers of online civil opening. (DMK)

Parties

Bausch
Party
Diallo
Party