Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-00912

#1

Mar 16, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Luis Landin Solorio. (Deputy Clerk KML) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#2

Mar 16, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Luis Landin Solorio. (Deputy Clerk KML) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#3

Mar 16, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/20/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk KML) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

Mar 16, 2026

Service by Mail

Mar 16, 2026

RECEIPT number 200017731 for $5.00 for Filing Fee from Luis Landin Solorio. (Deputy Clerk VLC)

Mar 16, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Luis Landin Solorio. (Deputy Clerk KML)

#4

Mar 17, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/17/2026: The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See e.g., Crispin M.C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-CV-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026); J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01354-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3013328 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025); Lepe v. Andrews, 801 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2025). On or before March 19, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Crispin M.C. v. Noem, J.A.C.P. v. Wofford and Lepe v. Andrews and justify denying the motion, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Respondents shall state their position as to whether the 2 motion for temporary restraining order should be converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether they request a hearing on the 2 motion. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Entered: 03/17/2026)

#5

Mar 17, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

#6

Mar 17, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/17/2026: The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See e.g., Crispin M.C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-CV-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026); J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01354-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3013328 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025); Lepe v. Andrews, 801 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2025). On or before March 19, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Crispin M.C. v. Noem, J.A.C.P. v. Wofford and Lepe v. Andrews and justify denying the motion, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Respondents shall state their position as to whether the 2 motion for temporary restraining order should be converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether they request a hearing on the 2 motion. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Entered: 03/17/2026)

Mar 17, 2026

Minute Order

#7

Mar 19, 2026

RESPONSE to 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Warden, California City Correctional Center. (Attachments: # 1 Ortiz-Martinez Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1 -- Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit 2 -- Form I-213, # 4 Exhibit 3 -- NLETS Rap Sheet)(Dextre, Christopher) (Entered: 03/19/2026)

#8

Mar 19, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service

#9

Mar 20, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#10

Mar 23, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/23/2026: (Text Only Entry). On March 20, 2026, the District Court issued an order 9 granting a preliminary injunction and referring the matter to the undersigned for further proceedings. The parties are directed to advise the Court within five (5) days whether they wish to provide additional briefing. If the parties do not respond within the specified time, the Court will assume the parties wish to proceed on their current submissions. (Deputy Clerk WAK) (Entered: 03/23/2026)

Mar 23, 2026

Service by Mail

Mar 23, 2026

Minute Order

Mar 23, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Minute Order, served on Luis Landin Solorio. (Deputy Clerk WAK)

#11

Mar 28, 2026

RESPONSE by Warden, California City Correctional Center to 10 Minute Order,,. (Dextre, Christopher) (Entered: 03/28/2026)

#12

Mar 28, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service

#13

Apr 09, 2026

Findings and Recommendations

Apr 09, 2026

Service by Mail

#14

Apr 16, 2026

Objections to Findings and Recommendations

#15

Apr 17, 2026

Objections to Findings and Recommendations

#16

Apr 17, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service

#17

Apr 27, 2026

Dismiss

#18

Apr 28, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 4/28/2026: (Text Only Entry): The Court has reviewed petitioner's 17 motion to dismiss this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Petitioner also requests that this Court order the government to execute his removal order, but this Court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate that request. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

Apr 28, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 18 Minute Order, served on Luis Landin Solorio. (Deputy Clerk VMG)

Apr 28, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Dismiss

Apr 28, 2026

Service by Mail