Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-02045
(HC) Mendez Juarez v. Warden, Mesa Verde Detention Center
Active
Case Information
Filed: March 14, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
April 27, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 14, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Director of San Francisco Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden of Mesa Verde Detention Center by Santos Rene Mendez Juarez. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13036297) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Juarez, Nancy) (Entered: 03/14/2026)
Main Document:
PETITION
#2
Mar 14, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Santos Rene Mendez Juarez. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Juarez, Nancy) (Entered: 03/14/2026)
Main Document:
MOTION
#3
Mar 16, 2026
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#4
Mar 16, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#5
Mar 16, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/16/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, Doc. No. 11 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 3/18/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 3/19/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the Petition and Motion by email to the U.S. Attorney's Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioner's Counsel shall do so by no later than 5:00 PM on 3/16/2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
#6
Mar 16, 2026
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Santos Rene Mendez Juarez. (Juarez, Nancy) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
Main Document:
Certificate / Proof of Service
Mar 16, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
#7
Mar 18, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document:
Dismiss
#8
Mar 18, 2026
Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document:
Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#9
Mar 18, 2026
REPLY by Santos Rene Mendez Juarez re 7 Motion to Dismiss, 8 Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Juarez, Nancy) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Main Document:
REPLY
#10
Mar 18, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/18/2026. In Respondents' 8 Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents continue to oppose issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order. However, Respondents do not identify any material distinction between this case and the court's previous decisions in Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, Doc. No. 11 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026), and other cases addressing the same issue presented here. Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Alvarez Maciel and Barajas Ortiz, Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner shall be released immediately from the Respondents' custody; and (2) should Respondents attempt to re-detain Petitioner, they shall provide him with a bond hearing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1236.1(c)(8) at which Petitioner shall bear the burden of showing that he is not a flight risk or a risk to community safety. This Order does not address the circumstances in which Respondents may detain Petitioner in the event Petitioner becomes subject to an executable final order of removal and Petitioner receives notice of that final order of removal. Moreover, in light of Respondents' non-opposition to treating Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (see Doc. No. 8 ), and given that the standard for issuing a Temporary Restraining Order is "substantially identical" to the standard for issuing a Preliminary Injunction, Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001), the court hereby ISSUES a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms. Therefore, this case is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk RAA) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Mar 18, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO
#11
Mar 20, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Main Document:
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#12
Apr 01, 2026
Findings and Recommendations
Main Document:
Findings and Recommendations
#13
Apr 07, 2026
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
Main Document:
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
#14
Apr 27, 2026
Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
#15
Apr 27, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
(HC) Mendez Juarez
Party
Warden, Mesa Verde Detention Center
Party