Western District of New York • 1:26-cv-00489
Jimenez Cabrera v. Bausch
Completed
Case Information
Filed: March 16, 2026
Assigned to:
Elizabeth Ann Wolford
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: April 09, 2026
Last Activity:
April 09, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 16, 2026
Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-5751632.), filed by Alexis Jimenez Cabrera. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Parole Document, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Call in Letter, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C- NTA, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D - ATD Documents, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit E - Order of Release on Recognizance, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit F - Asylum Receipt Notice, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit G - Administrative Closure Order)(McLean, Siana) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
Main Document:
Emergency PETITION
#2
Mar 17, 2026
TEXT ORDER re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This Court has issued Decision and Orders in Quituizaca Quituisaca v. Bondi, et al., No. 25-cv-6527, 2025 WL 3264440 (W.D.N.Y Nov. 24, 2025) and Lieogo v. Freden, et al., No. 6:25-CV-06615 EAW, 2025 WL 3290694 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2025), finding that noncitizens who are present in the United States without having been admitted or paroled are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) but instead are subject to detention under section 1226. In addition, this Court issued Decision and Orders in Ivonin v. Rhoney, et al., No. 6:25-CV-06673 EAW, 2026 WL 199283 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2026) and Ab-Rahim v. Marich, No. 6:26-CV-06005-EAW, 2026 WL 279113, at *1 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2026), holding that the detention of noncitizens following expiration of parole is also governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226, and not § 1225. The Court has also concluded based on the circumstances in these cases and a balancing of the factors under Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), that due process requires the burden to be on the government at the bond hearing to establish dangerousness or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., Lieogo, 2025 WL 3290694, at *4-5. In deciding whether the government has met their burden of proof, the IJ must consider whether less-restrictive alternatives to detention can reasonably address the government's interest in continued detention and if the IJ finds that the government has not met this burden, then in setting any bond the IJ must consider ability to pay and alternative conditions of release. Id.Accordingly, Respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before March 24, 2026, why, in light of those decisions, the petition in this case should not be granted to the extent that it seeks an order requiring that Petitioner receive a bond hearing at which the government bears the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk and at which the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, Petitioner's ability to pay.In addition, the Court temporarily enjoins Respondents from transferring Petitioner outside this District pending a resolution of the petition because the Court finds that Petitioner's presence in the District is necessary to support the Court's resolution of the issues in the petition, including because it will enable Petitioner to fully participate in these proceedings and maintain adequate access to legal counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("Unless the application for the writ and the return present only issues of law the person to whom the writ is directed shall be required to produce at the hearing the body of the person detained. The applicant or the person detained may, under oath, deny any of the facts set forth in the return or allege any other material facts."). This temporary order extends to the transfer of Petitioner outside the country so as to maintain the status quo and solely so that the Court can make an informed decision about its authority to issue relief and whether any relief that it has the power to issue should be granted.Further, the Clerk's Office is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this Text Order electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York at USANYW-Immigration-Habeas@usdoj.gov. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 3/17/2026. (EKH)Clerk to Follow up (Entered: 03/17/2026)
Mar 17, 2026
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (LB)
Mar 17, 2026
Case assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to chambers of online civil opening. (LB)
Mar 17, 2026
Remark: Clerk's Office sent copy of Dkt. 1 Petition and Dkt. 2 Text Order as directed. (LB)
#3
Mar 19, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Adam A. Khalil on behalf of James Bausch, Pam Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 03/19/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#4
Mar 19, 2026
REPLY/RESPONSE to re 2 Text Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by James Bausch, Pam Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 03/19/2026)
Main Document:
REPLY/RESPONSE
#5
Mar 20, 2026
ORDER granting 1 petition to the extent Petitioner seeks a bond hearing. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 03/20/2026. (EKH) (Entered: 03/20/2026)
#6
Mar 30, 2026
Letter filed by James Bausch, Pam Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney re bond hearing. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 03/30/2026)
Main Document:
Letter
#7
Apr 01, 2026
TEXT ORDER. On March 30, 2026, Respondents informed the Court that a bond hearing was held and bond was set. (Dkt. 6). The Court views the issues raised by the petition as now resolved and intends to direct the Clerk's Office to close the case, unless on or before April 8, 2026, either party objects. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 4/1/2026. (EKH) (Entered: 04/01/2026)
#8
Apr 09, 2026
TEXT ORDER. On March 20, 2026, the Court granted Petitioner's petition (Dkt. 1) to the extent it seeks a bond hearing (Dkt. 5). On March 30, 2026, Respondents informed the Court that a bond hearing was held and bond was set. (Dkt. 6). The Court issued a Text Order on April 1, 2026, directing the parties to inform the Court on or before April 8, 2026, if any matters in the petition remained unresolved and to date nothing has been filed. (Dkt. 7). Accordingly, the Court dismisses any remaining claims in the petition without prejudice and directs the Clerk of Court to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 4/9/2026. (EKH)Clerk to Follow up (Entered: 04/09/2026)
#9
Apr 09, 2026
JUDGMENT in favor of Alexis Jimenez Cabrera against James Bausch, Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, Philip Rhoney, Todd Lyons. Signed by Andrew W. Moeller, Clerk of Court on 4/9/2026. (CGJ) (Entered: 04/09/2026)
Main Document:
JUDGMENT
Parties
Bausch
Party
Jimenez Cabrera
Party