Eastern District of New York • 1:26-cv-01500

G.H.H. v. Genalo

Completed

Case Information

Filed: March 13, 2026
Assigned to: Pamela Ki Mai Chen
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: March 23, 2026
Last Activity: March 25, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 13, 2026
Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANYEDC-20004836, filed by G.H.H.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - GHH Declaration) (Lampert, Alexandra) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
#2
Mar 13, 2026
Civil Cover Sheet.. by G.H.H. (Lampert, Alexandra) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
Main Document: Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet
#3
Mar 13, 2026
MOTION to Seal for leave to proceed via pseudonym by G.H.H.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Lampert, Alexandra) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
Main Document: Seal
#4
Mar 16, 2026
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
Main Document: Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening
#5
Mar 16, 2026
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Upon review of Petitioner G.H.H.'s Emergency Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Dkt. 1), and Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym, (Dkt. 3), it is hereby ordered that: 1. Having considered the factors laid out in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008), the Court GRANTS Petitioner's motion to proceed pseudonymously and to redact the personal identifying information discussed in the motion, (Dkt. 3). 2. Respondents shall, by 12:00 p.m. on March 19, 2026, show cause in writing why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued and why Petitioner should not be immediately released. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. If Respondents contend that Petitioner is detained under a statute other than 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), their response must state what facts, if any, distinguish Petitioner's case from the vast majority of district court cases that have disagreed with Respondents' contention. See Barco Mercado v. Francis, No. 25-CV-6582 (LAK), 2025 WL 3295903, at *4, *13–14 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2025) (collecting cases). In particular, Respondents are directed to state: a. What distinguishes Petitioner's case from the numerous other cases in which the petitioner, who had resided in the United States for several years, was found to be improperly detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). (Pet., Dkt. 1, ¶¶ 1, 19); see Padilla Molina v. DeLeon, No. 25-CV-6526 (JMA), 2025 WL 3718728, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2025) (compiling cases). b. The basis for Petitioner's extended stop on January 27, 2026, which Petitioner alleges was unlawfully race-based. (See Pet., Dkt. 1, ¶¶ 1, 19, 74–75; G.H.H. Decl., Dkt. 1-1); Escobar Molina v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., No. 25-CV-3417 (BAH), 2025 WL 3465518, at *13 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2025) (drawing from Fourth Amendment standard and granting preliminary injunction upon finding likelihood of plaintiffs' success on the merits, where plaintiffs challenged Department of Homeland Security's practice of warrantless arrests on statutory grounds). Finally, Respondents are directed to include "affidavits and exhibits . . . to establish the lawfulness and correct duration of Petitioner's detention in light of the issues raised in the habeas petition." See Belqui M. v. Bondi, No. 26-CV-0308 (MJD) (SGE), 2026 WL 185203, at *1 (D. Minn. Jan. 21, 2026), R&R adopted, 2026 WL 194071 (D. Minn. Jan. 25, 2026). 3. To preserve the Court's jurisdiction pending a ruling on the Petition, Respondents are restrained from removing Petitioner from the United States until further order of this Court. See M.K. v. Joyce, No. 25-CV-1935 (JMF), 2025 WL 750599, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2025) (collecting cases ordering same). 4. Furthermore, considering Petitioner's interest in participating in proceedings before this Court and maintaining adequate access to legal counsel, Respondents are restrained from transferring Petitioner to a facility outside of this District absent further order of this Court. See Samb v. Joyce, No. 25-CV-6374 (DEH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2025) (Dkt. 3) (collecting cases ordering same); 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (empowering courts to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law"). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/16/2026. (PS) (Entered: 03/16/2026)
Main Document: Order on Motion to Seal AND Order to Show Cause (463)
#6
Mar 16, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Mar 16, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Mar 16, 2026
Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM)
#7
Mar 19, 2026
Letter
#8
Mar 20, 2026
Memorandum & Opinion
#9
Mar 22, 2026
Letter
#10
Mar 25, 2026
Judgment - Clerk
Main Document: Judgment - Clerk