District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-11264

#1

Mar 13, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11610476 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Anderzon Manuel Guzman Campos. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form Category Form)(Corbaci, Christina) (Entered: 03/13/2026)

#2

Mar 13, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. EMERGENCY ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (JPM) (Entered: 03/13/2026)

#3

Mar 16, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Brian E. Murphy assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (CM) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#4

Mar 16, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MBM) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#5

Mar 16, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL.Respondents shall determine whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-CV-12664-PBS (D. Mass.), and notify the Court no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 17, 2026.Respondents shall provide any further answer to the Petition, if necessary, no later than 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 19, 2026. (MBM) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#6

Mar 16, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 5 Service Order - 2241 Petition, mailed to all respondents on 3/16/2026. (MBM) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

Mar 16, 2026

Copy Mailed

Mar 16, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#7

Mar 18, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#8

Mar 18, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#9

Mar 20, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. “Respondents acknowledge that, should the Court follow its reasoning in [Rincon v. Hyde, --- F. Supp. 3d --, 2025 WL 3122784 (D. Mass. Nov. 7, 2025), and Tenemasa-Lema v. Hyde, -- F. Supp. 3d --, 2025 WL 328055 (D. Mass. Nov. 25, 2025)], the Court would likely find that that ICE detention authority remains 8 U.S.C. [s.] 1225(b)(1), but that, in this instance, Petitioner’s detention without a bond hearing violates his due process rights.” Dkt. 8 at 2. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Rincon, the Court GRANTS this Petition in part and ORDERS that Petitioner receive a constitutionally adequate bond hearing to consider the merits of his release. Any request for fees should be filed within the deadlines set by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. s. 2412. (MBM) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

#10

Mar 20, 2026

Judgment

Mar 20, 2026

Order