Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-02009

(HC) Robles Amador v. Bondi

Completed

Case Information

Filed: March 12, 2026
Assigned to: Troy Lynne Nunley
Referred to: Sean C. Riordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Completed: August 27, 2026
Last Activity: August 27, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 12, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Yoany Adrian Robles Amador. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13029469) (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet)(Nava, Ramon) (Entered: 03/12/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Mar 13, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/16/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk CLA) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#3
Mar 13, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#4
Mar 13, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on March 13, 2026: The Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 1 .) Petitioner requests this Court issue a writ ordering Petitioner's immediate release. If Petitioner seeks emergency relief and intends to file a motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO"), Petitioner shall file the motion as soon as possible and no later than two (2) court days from the date of this order. If Petitioner does not intend to file a TRO, Petitioner shall notify the Court immediately at mkrueger@caed.uscourts.gov. Pending the Court's ruling on the petition, Respondents shall not take any action to transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (acknowledging the Court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
Mar 13, 2026
Minute Order
#5
Mar 17, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Yoany Adrian Robles Amador. (Attachments: # 1 TRO Checklist, # 2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities with Exhibits, # 3 Proposed Order)(Nava, Ramon) (Entered: 03/17/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#6
Mar 17, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on March 17, 2026: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). (ECF No. 2 .) The Court has reviewed Petitioner's motion and finds Petitioner has met his burden establishing a TRO is warranted under the factors articulated in Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Petitioner has established: (1) a likelihood of success on his claims that Respondents violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; (2) Petitioner will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO; (3) the balance of equities tip in Petitioner's favor; and (4) a TRO is in the public interest. The Court has repeatedly ruled on the issues presented in the instant case. See, e.g., Morales-Flores v. Lyons, No. 1:25-CV-01640-TLN-EFB, 2025 WL 3552841, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2025). Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for TRO is GRANTED. To return Petitioner to the status quo ante litem, Respondents are ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner [A#221-172-826] under the same conditions he was released prior to his current detention. At the time of release, Respondents must return all of Petitioner's documents and possessions. Respondents are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner absent compliance with constitutional protections, including seven-days' notice and a pre-deprivation hearing. Respondents are further ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not grant the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and enter judgment in favor of Petitioner. Respondents shall file responsive papers by March 24, 2026. Failure to timely respond shall be construed as a non-opposition. See L.R. 230(c). Petitioner may file a reply by March 27, 2026. The parties shall indicate whether they request a hearing. Petitioner shall immediately serve this Order and all documents filed in this case on Respondents with a copy via email to: usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. Respondents may apply to the Court for modification or dissolution of the TRO on two days' notice to Petitioner. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(4). The bond requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c) is waived. SO ORDERED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 03/17/2026)
Mar 17, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO
#7
Mar 18, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#8
Mar 23, 2026
RESPONSE by Pamela Jo Bondi, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Warden Golden State Annex Facility, ICE Field Office Director, Kristi Noem to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 6 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,, Order on Motion for TRO,,,,,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit ATD Violation Log)(Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 03/23/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#9
Aug 27, 2026
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/27/2026 GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Respondents are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-arresting or redetaining Petitioner, while subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), absent compliance with statutory and constitutional protections, including a minimum of seven-days' notice and a pre-deprivationhearing before a neutral factfinder where Respondents demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the government's interest in protecting the public or ensuring Petitioner appears at future immigration proceedings outweighs Petitioner's constitutionally protected interest inremaining free from detention such that no alternative to detention can mitigate flight risk. The court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Petitioner and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AMW) (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Main Document: Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#10
Aug 27, 2026
JUDGMENT dated *8/27/2026* pursuant to order signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/27/2026 in favor of Petitioner. (Deputy Clerk AMW) (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Main Document: Judgment

Parties

Bondi
Party
(HC) Robles Amador
Party