District of Massachusetts • 1:25-cv-13038

#1

Oct 16, 2025

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#2

Oct 17, 2025

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (CM) (Entered: 10/17/2025)

#3

Oct 17, 2025

Service Order-2241 Petition

#4

Oct 17, 2025

General Order 19-02

Oct 17, 2025

Notice of Case Assignment

#5

Oct 20, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole M. O'Connor on behalf of Pamela Bondi, Department of Homeland Security, Patricia Hyde, Todd M Lyons, Antone Moniz, Kristi L. Noem (O'Connor, Nicole) (Entered: 10/20/2025)

#6

Oct 20, 2025

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 3 Service Order - 2241 Petition sent to Duty AUSA Mundele by email 10/17/2025 and mailed to USAO and Respondents on 10/20/2025. (CAM) (Entered: 10/20/2025)

Oct 20, 2025

Copy Mailed

#7

Oct 30, 2025

Extension of Time to File Document

#8

Oct 31, 2025

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING 7 Motion for Extension of Time to November 3, 2025 to File Response to Habeas Petition. (CAM) (Entered: 10/31/2025)

Oct 31, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

#9

Nov 03, 2025

Response - not related to a motion

#10

Nov 04, 2025

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Before the Court is Petitioner Marcio Alves Ferreira’s emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus. [ECF No. 1 ]. Respondents “recognize that the legal issues raised in this Petition are similar to those recently addressed by this Court in Morales v. Plymouth C[ounty] Correctional Facility,” No. 25-cv-12602, ECF No. 15 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2025). [ECF No. 9 at 1]. In that case, this Court joined other sessions of this Court, and other courts across the country, in holding that the arrest and detention of noncitizens within the United States is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Respondents acknowledge that “[s]hould the Court apply the reasoning of Morales, it would reach the same result here.” [Id. at 2]. On the facts before it, the Court does not find reason to deviate from its prior analysis. Petitioner is subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1226’s discretionary detention framework and, accordingly, entitled to a bond hearing. He has not received such a hearing, so his detention is unlawful. Petitioner’s petition, [ECF No. 1 ], is GRANTED IN PART. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within 10 days of this order. Respondents are ENJOINED from denying Petitioner bond on the basis that he is detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). Respondents are ORDERED to file a status report within 14 days of this order stating whether Petitioner has been granted bond, and, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial.(CAM) (Entered: 11/04/2025)

Nov 04, 2025

Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines

#11

Nov 13, 2025

Stipulation of Dismissal