Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01979

#1

Mar 12, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Christopher Chestnut, Markwayne Mullin, RYAN L SPRADLIN, Rodney S. Scott by ARNOLDO PRICILIO CHALU QUINTEROS. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13024952) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Supplement)(Barrios, Carlos) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

#2

Mar 12, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by ARNOLDO PRICILIO CHALU QUINTEROS. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Barrios, Carlos) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

#3

Mar 12, 2026

Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider

#4

Mar 12, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

#5

Mar 12, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/12/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, no later than tomorrow, 3/13/2026, by 5:00 PM, petitioner's counsel is DIRECTED (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with this order, to the United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of California by email at usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov; and (2) to promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Monday, 3/16/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Rangel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-00084-DAD-CSK, 2026 WL 73996 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2026) and Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, California City Correctional Center, No. 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB, 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondents are DIRECTED to indicate in their opposition whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether they oppose the court resolving the merits of the underlying habeas petition. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk JRM) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

Mar 12, 2026

Minute Order

#6

Mar 13, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/13/2026)

#7

Mar 13, 2026

RESPONSE by Arnoldo Pricilio Chalu Quinteros to 5 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,. (Barrios, Carlos) (Entered: 03/13/2026)

Mar 17, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

#10

Mar 31, 2026

Ex Parte Application

Apr 08, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Ex Parte Application