Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01977

#1

Mar 11, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden Golden State Annex Facility by Gurpreet Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13023872) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Mann, Kamal) (Entered: 03/11/2026)

#2

Mar 11, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Gurpreet Singh. (Mann, Kamal) (Entered: 03/11/2026)

#3

Mar 12, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/16/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

#4

Mar 12, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

#5

Mar 12, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/12/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See e.g., Crispin M.C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-CV-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026); J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01354-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3013328 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025); Lepe v. Andrews, 801 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2025). On or before March 16, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Crispin M.C. v. Noem, J.A.C.P. v. Wofford and Lepe v. Andrews and justify denying the motion, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Respondents shall state their position as to whether the 2 motion for temporary restraining order should be converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether they request a hearing on the 2 motion. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

Mar 12, 2026

Minute Order

#6

Mar 15, 2026

Dismiss

#7

Mar 15, 2026

RESPONSE by Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, Warden of Golden State Annex Facility to 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, 5 Minute Order,,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Ex. 1 Notice to Appear, # 2 Ex.2 RAP Sheet)(Ahmed, Ihsan) (Entered: 03/15/2026)

#8

Mar 17, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/17/2026: (Text Only Entry). The 7 response to the Court's order to show cause appears to note facts that were not set out in the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Nevertheless, the Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim one of the 1 petition. See e.g., Yon Kervis U. v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-CV-2066-KES-SAB (HC), 2026 WL 88983 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2026); Guzman v. Andrews, No. 1:25-CV-01015-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 2617256 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); Clene C.D. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01463-KES-SKO (HC), 2026 WL 84302 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2026); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before March 19, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Yon Kervis U. v. Chestnut, Guzman v. Andrews, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, Clene C.D. v. Robbins, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

Mar 17, 2026

Minute Order

#9

Mar 18, 2026

RESPONSE by Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, Warden of Golden State Annex Facility to 8 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,. (Ahmed, Ihsan) (Entered: 03/18/2026)

#10

Mar 18, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Dismiss

#11

Mar 19, 2026

Judgment AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case