Southern District of California • 3:25-cv-02734
Martinez Lopez v. Noem
Terminated
Case Information
Filed: October 15, 2025
Assigned to:
Todd Wallace Robinson
Referred to:
Valerie E. Torres
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Terminated: October 23, 2025
Last Activity:
October 23, 2025
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Oct 15, 2025
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Pamela Jo Bondi, Christopher LaRose, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, Jesus Rocha ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-2038387.), filed by Fredy Armando Martinez Lopez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibits to Petition)The new case number is 3:25-cv-2734-TWR-VET. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case. (Schoenberg, Lori)(ggv) (Entered: 10/15/2025)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Oct 17, 2025
Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Main Document:
Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice
#3
Oct 17, 2025
Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Main Document:
Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice
#4
Oct 17, 2025
Order to Show Cause
Main Document:
Order to Show Cause
#5
Oct 19, 2025
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#6
Oct 20, 2025
Order re Pro Hac Vice Application
Main Document:
Order re Pro Hac Vice Application
#7
Oct 20, 2025
Pro Hac Vice Approved - Clerk
Main Document:
Pro Hac Vice Approved - Clerk
#8
Oct 20, 2025
Affidavit of Service
Main Document:
Affidavit of Service
#9
Oct 20, 2025
Appear
Main Document:
Appear
#10
Oct 22, 2025
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#11
Oct 22, 2025
Return to Petition
Main Document:
Return to Petition
#12
Oct 22, 2025
Order on Motion for Leave to Appear
Main Document:
Order on Motion for Leave to Appear
#13
Oct 23, 2025
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Todd W. Robinson: Show Cause Hearing held on 10/23/2025. The Court finds that 8 U.S.C. § 1252's jurisdiction stripping provisions do not bar this Court from considering Petitioner's habeas petition. The Court further finds that requiring petitioner to exhaust available administrative remedies would be futile because the IJ and BIA would apply clearly binding precedent of Matter of Yajure Hurtado to find that detention is mandatory in this instance under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). The Court finds that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) applies to Petitioner, and Petitioner is therefore entitled to an individualized bond hearing. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Petition and ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within fourteen days. Respondents SHALL NOT deny Petitioner's bond on the basis that 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) requires mandatory detention. The Court DENIES IN PART the Petition to the extent that Petitioner requests to be released from custody. (Court Reporter/ECR Cami Kircher). (Plaintiff Attorney Carlos Estrada (t)). (Defendant Attorney AUSA Erin Dimbleby). (no document attached) (jao) (Entered: 10/23/2025)
Oct 23, 2025
Show Cause Hearing
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm