Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01927

(HC) Kumar v. Albarran

Active

Case Information

Filed: March 10, 2026
Assigned to: Jennifer L. Thurston
Referred to: Helena Barch-Kuchta
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: March 13, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 10, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Ankit Kumar. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13016465) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EOIR Automated Proof, # 2 Exhibit crim rrecord, # 3 Proposed Order)(Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Mar 10, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Ankit Kumar. (Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Main Document: CIVIL
#3
Mar 10, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Ankit Kumar. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Proposed Order)(Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#4
Mar 10, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/13/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk EF) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#5
Mar 10, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Mar 10, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) The Court has reviewed the Petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) and the related request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 3). Petitioner asserts that he has been detained since May 15, 2025 (Doc. 1 at 2), nearly 10 months ago. He does not explain his delay in seeking his request for a temporary restraining order or why despite this delay, the Court should treat the situation as an emergency. Thus, the TRO request is untimely, and it is DENIED. Local Rule 231(b). The Court refers the matter to the assigned magistrate judge for a determination on the merits. The Court sets the following briefing schedule, which may be modified by the magistrate judge as needed. Respondents SHALL file their responsive pleading within 21 days. Petitioner may file a traverse no later than 7 days after the respondents file their brief.In the meantime, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that Respondents shall not remove Petitioner from the United States nor transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the circumstances, the Court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and any subsequent order and finds that Petitioner has satisfied the factors governing the issuance of such relief signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on March 10, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Mar 10, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
Mar 13, 2026
Minute Order

Parties

Albarran
Party
(HC) Kumar
Party