Western District of Tennessee • 2:26-cv-02247
Morales Guerrero v. Minter
Active
Case Information
Filed: March 09, 2026
Assigned to:
Mark Saalfield Norris Sr.
Referred to:
Tu M. Pham
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
March 11, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 09, 2026
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATNWDC-4907531), filed by Jose Enrique Morales Guerrero.(Sligh, Kalyn) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Mar 09, 2026
Judge Mark S. Norris and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
Main Document:
Add and Terminate Judges
#3
Mar 09, 2026
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
Mar 09, 2026
Notice LR 16.2
#4
Mar 10, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart J. Canale on behalf of All Defendants (Canale, Stuart) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#5
Mar 11, 2026
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Enrique Morales Guerrero has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: civil cover sheet was not included with the filing. Please refer to the ECF User Manual and ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (mf) (Entered: 03/11/2026)
#6
Mar 11, 2026
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mf) (Entered: 03/11/2026)
#7
Mar 11, 2026
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form (form AO 85) is available on the US Courts website at https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/forms. (mf) (Entered: 03/11/2026)
#8
Mar 11, 2026
Amended Document (NOT Motion)
Main Document:
Amended Document (NOT Motion)
Mar 11, 2026
ADR Compliance
Mar 11, 2026
Deficiency Notice
Mar 11, 2026
Notice LR 72.1 - Right to Consent to Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge
Parties
Minter
Party
Morales Guerrero
Party