Northern District of Ohio • 4:25-cv-02183

Mendoza v. Director of the Detroit Field Office for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Terminated

Case Information

Filed: October 13, 2025
Assigned to: Pamela Ann Barker
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Terminated: November 12, 2025
Last Activity: January 08, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Oct 13, 2025
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241)
#2
Oct 14, 2025
First Exhibit(s) for Petitioner Rodriguez Mendoza filed by Guillermo Acevedo Diaz, Jose Rodriguez Mendoza. Related document(s) 1 . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Form I-286, # 2 Exhibit Bond motion, # 3 Exhibit IJ order denying bond, # 4 Exhibit Form I-862, # 5 Exhibit Written Pleadings before EOIR, # 6 Exhibit Form I-589, # 7 Exhibit BIA bond appeal)(Hoffman, Brian) (Entered: 10/14/2025)
Main Document: First
#3
Oct 14, 2025
Second Exhibit(s) for Petitioner Acevedo Diaz filed by Guillermo Acevedo Diaz, Jose Rodriguez Mendoza. Related document(s) 1 . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Form I-286, # 2 Exhibit Bond motion, # 3 Exhibit IJ order denying bond, # 4 Exhibit Form I-862)(Hoffman, Brian) (Entered: 10/14/2025)
Main Document: Second
#4
Oct 14, 2025
Third Exhibit(s) for Petitioner Acevedo Diaz filed by Guillermo Acevedo Diaz, Jose Rodriguez Mendoza. Related document(s) 3, 1, 2 . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Form I-589, # 2 Exhibit BIA bond appeal, # 3 Exhibit Motion to change hearing format, # 4 Exhibit IJ denial of motion to change hearing format)(Hoffman, Brian) (Entered: 10/14/2025)
Main Document: Third
#5
Oct 14, 2025
Motion to supplement (summonses for Respondents-Defendants) filed by Guillermo Acevedo Diaz, Jose Rodriguez Mendoza. Related document(s) 1 . (Hoffman, Brian) (Entered: 10/14/2025)
Main Document: Supplement
#6
Oct 14, 2025
Order
Main Document: Order
Oct 14, 2025
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (M,Do)
Oct 14, 2025
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr.. (M,Do)
Oct 14, 2025
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/14/2025. (P,K)
Oct 14, 2025
Order
#8
Oct 22, 2025
Returned Certified Mail addressed to Party Office of the United States Attorney NDOH. Return to Sender - Any mail piece over one - half inch thick that uses postage stamps. (M,Do) (Entered: 10/22/2025)
Main Document: Returned
#9
Oct 24, 2025
Returned Certified Mail addressed to Party Attorney General of the United States. Return to Sender - Any mail piece over one - half inch thick that uses postage stamps. (M,Do) (Entered: 10/24/2025)
Main Document: Returned
Oct 24, 2025
Order
Oct 24, 2025
Order [non-document] On October 14, 2025, this Court issued an Order directing Petitioners to "(1) forward a copy of the Petition and its Exhibits (Doc. Nos. 1 through 5 ) and this Order to each of the Respondents immediately upon receipt of this Order; and (2) file a Notice on the docket confirming that they have done so." (Doc. No. 6 .) Petitioners have failed to do so. In addition, the docket reflects that two of the certified mail packages provided by Petitioners to the Clerk of Court for service on Respondents have been returned as undeliverable because counsel for Petitioners improperly used postage stamps on packages that were over one-half inch thick. Given Petitioners' request that this Court expedite review of the Petition, Petitioners have an obligation to comply with this Court's Order and to promptly serve the Petition and its attachments on Respondents. The Court therefore once again ORDERS Petitioners to immediately (1) forward a copy of the Petition and its Exhibits (Doc. Nos. 1 through 5) and the Court's Order at Doc. No. 6 to each of the Respondents immediately upon receipt of this Order; and (2) file a Notice on the docket confirming that they have done so. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/24/2025. (P,K)
#12
Oct 28, 2025
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
Main Document: Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
#15
Nov 04, 2025
Reply in support of 12 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Guillermo Acevedo Diaz, Jose Rodriguez Mendoza. (Hoffman, Brian) (Entered: 11/04/2025)
Main Document: Reply
#16
Nov 06, 2025
Returned Mail addressed to Party Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Return to Sender - Any mail piece over one - half inch thick that uses postage stamps. (D,Lu) (Entered: 11/06/2025)
Main Document: Returned
#17
Nov 06, 2025
Returned Mail addressed to Party Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Return to Sender - Any mail piece over one - half inch thick that uses postage stamps. (D,Lu) (Entered: 11/06/2025)
Main Document: Returned
Nov 07, 2025
Order
Nov 07, 2025
Remark by Clerk. Copy of the Petition and its attachments (Doc. Nos. 1- 5) mailed to the Attorney General of the United States. (P,K)
Nov 07, 2025
Order [non-document] The docket reflects that a copy of the Petition was forwarded to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Ohio by both the Clerk of Court and the Petitioners. To ensure that there is no question regarding proper service, the Clerk is hereby further instructed to forward a copy of the Petition and its attachments (Doc. Nos. 1- 5) to the Attorney General of the United States. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/7/2025. (P,K)
#18
Nov 12, 2025
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For all the reasons set forth in this Opinion, Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12 ) is granted as follows. Respondents Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi are hereby dismissed, and the Petition (Doc. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/12/2025. (F,AW)
Main Document: Memorandum Opinion and Order
#19
Nov 12, 2025
Judgment AND ~Util - Case Termination
Main Document: Judgment AND ~Util - Case Termination
#20
Dec 09, 2025
Alter/Amend judgment
Main Document: Alter/Amend judgment
#21
Dec 18, 2025
Opposition to 20 Motion to alter/amend judgment based on intervening change in law filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Bautista Docket Report)(Swanson-Haan, Karen) (Entered: 12/18/2025)
Main Document: Opposition
#22
Dec 22, 2025
Attorney Appearance by Patricia M. Fitzgerald filed by on behalf of Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Kevin Raycraft. (Fitzgerald, Patricia) (Entered: 12/22/2025)
Main Document: Attorney
#23
Dec 22, 2025
Notice of Supplemental Authority and Motion for Leave to File Attached Opposition filed by Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Kevin Raycraft. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1- Final Judgment, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Opposition Based on Supplemental Authority)(Fitzgerald, Patricia) (Entered: 12/22/2025)
Main Document: Notice
Dec 23, 2025
Order
Dec 23, 2025
Order [non-document] Respondents' Motion for Leave to File Attached Opposition (Doc. No. 23 ) is granted. The Opposition (Doc. No. 23-2) attached to the Motion is deemed filed as of the date of this Order. Petitioner's Reply is due December 30, 2025. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 12/23/2025. (P,K)
#24
Dec 30, 2025
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion
Main Document: Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion
Jan 02, 2026
Order on Motion for extension of time to file response/reply to motion
Jan 02, 2026
Order [non-document] Petitioners' Unopposed Motion for One-Week Extension to Respond to Defendants' Supplemental Opposition is granted. (Doc. No. 24 .) Accordingly, Petitioners shall file their response to Defendants' Supplemental Opposition (Doc. No. 23 -2) by 1/6/26. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 1/2/2026.(P,K)
#26
Jan 07, 2026
Extension (other)
Main Document: Extension (other)
Jan 08, 2026
Order on Motion for extension of time (other)