Eastern District of New York • 1:26-cv-01312

#1

Mar 06, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

#2

Mar 06, 2026

Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet

#3

Mar 06, 2026

Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet

#4

Mar 06, 2026

Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening

#5

Mar 06, 2026

Summons Issued as to USA

#6

Mar 06, 2026

Order(Other)

Mar 06, 2026

ORDER: To preserve the Court's jurisdiction pending final disposition of the 1 Petition, Respondents are enjoined from moving Petitioner to a location outside this District, the Southern District of New York, or the District of New Jersey absent further order of this Court. See, e.g., Loc. 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO v. N.Y. Shipping Ass'n, Inc., 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992) ("Once the district court acquires jurisdiction over the subject matter of, and the parties to, the litigation, the All Writs Act [28 U.S.C. § 1651] authorizes a federal court to protect that jurisdiction."); Garcia-Izquierdo v. Gartner, No. 04 Civ. 7377, 2004 WL 2093515, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 17, 2004) (observing that, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, a district court "may order that a petitioner's deportation be stayed... when a stay is necessary to preserve the Court's jurisdiction of the case"); Khalil v. Joyce, No. 25 Civ. 1935, 2025 WL 750599, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2025) (barring the government from removing petitioner from the United States until the Court could address his claim); Ozturk v. Hyde, 136 F.4th 382 (2d Cir. 2025) (declining to stay a district court order, issued pursuant to the All Writs Act, which transferred petitioner to the district court's territorial jurisdiction, given district courts' "undeniabl[e]... inherent authority to protect [its] proceedings" (citation modified)); cf. Michael v. I.N.S., 48 F.3d 657, 661-62 (2d Cir. 1995) (holding that the All Writs Act provides a federal court of appeals reviewing a final removal order with a basis to stay removal). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to email a copy of this Order and the Petition to the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Eastern District of New York. Petitioner's counsel shall also serve a copy of the order on the USAO. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 3/6/2026. (JK)

Mar 06, 2026

Order(Other)

Mar 06, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Mar 06, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV)

#7

Mar 07, 2026

Adjourn Conference

#8

Mar 07, 2026

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference AND Order(Other)

#9

Mar 08, 2026

Letter

#10

Jun 05, 2026

Attorney Fees

Jun 08, 2026

ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's 10 Motion for Attorney Fees. If Respondents wish to file a response, they shall do so by June 19, 2026. In any response, Respondents should address whether the issues governing the fee application are distinguishable from the Court's recent decision in Merlo Puerto v. Leeper, No. 26-CV-403, 2026 WL 1600665 (E.D.N.Y. June 4, 2026). Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 6/8/2026. (JK)

Jun 08, 2026

Order(Other)