Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-00392

#1

Mar 10, 2026

ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)

#2

Mar 11, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice (for Attorney filers only, Credit Card required)

#3

Mar 11, 2026

Proposed Order re 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by HUGO ALBERTO ORDONEZ PEREZ. (Williams, Ysabel) (Entered: 03/11/2026)

Mar 11, 2026

Judge Stephanie L. Haines added. (ljs)

Mar 11, 2026

CLERK'S REQUEST FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION re 2 First MOTION for attorney Ysabel Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-9418872). ERROR: Filer did not attach a Proposed Order as required by LCvR 7. CORRECTION: Filer to submit a proposed order using the Proposed Order event. Filer is to link the Proposed Order to the relevant motion in the event. (rjr)

#4

Mar 13, 2026

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

#5

Mar 17, 2026

Case Management Order

#6

Mar 17, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Compliance re 5 Case Management Order,,,,, by Ysabel Williams on behalf of HUGO ALBERTO ORDONEZ PEREZ (Williams, Ysabel) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

#7

Mar 18, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole A. Stockey on behalf of PAMELA J. BONDI, TODD LYONS, KRISTI NOEM, DAVID O'NEAL, LEONARD ODDO. (Stockey, Nicole) (Entered: 03/18/2026)

#8

Mar 25, 2026

RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PAMELA J. BONDI, TODD LYONS, KRISTI NOEM, DAVID O'NEAL, LEONARD ODDO. (Stockey, Nicole) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

#9

Apr 06, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#10

Apr 06, 2026

EXHIBITS in Support of 9 Motion for TRO by HUGO ALBERTO ORDONEZ PEREZ. (Williams, Ysabel) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

#11

Apr 07, 2026

ORDER denying 9 Motion for TRO. ORDER. Petitioner's 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. In his Motion, Petitioner seeks to enjoin transfer outside of the Western District of Pennsylvania. This Court lacks authority to grant that relief as the places of detention for aliens pending removal is left to the discretion of the Attorney General, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(g)(1), and Congress has "limited federal district courts' jurisdiction to review decisions or actions made pursuant to the sound discretion of DHS officials[.]" Jane v. Rodriguez, No. 20-CV-5922 (ES), 2020 WL 10140953, at *1 (D.N.J. May 22, 2020); see also Sinclair v. Attorney General of U.S., 198 F. Appx 218, 222 n.3 (3d Cir. 2006). Further, as this Court has previously explained, the All Writs Act does not change the fact that it lacks jurisdiction to enjoin Petitioners transfer outside this District. T.A. v. Oddo, Case No. 3:25-cv-425, ECF No. 13 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2025). Finally, insofar as Petitioner seeks an Order from the Court barring his removal from the country pending his Voluntary Departure period, he has not provided any facts to the Court indicating that such an event is imminent. (See ECF No. 9). Therefore, because Petitioner has failed to show that he faces a risk of immediate and irreparable harm in the form of imminent removal absent a T.R.O., the Court denies Petitioners request for such relief. FED. R. CIV. P. 65(b)(1)(A) (providing that a T.R.O. may only issue where specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioners Motion at ECF No. 9. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 4/7/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (nsk) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

Apr 07, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO