Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01820

#1

Mar 06, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden by Jose Hernan Bonilla Vasquez. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

#2

Mar 06, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jose Hernan Bonilla Vasquez. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

#3

Mar 06, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Hernan Bonilla Vasquez. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

#4

Mar 06, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jose Hernan Bonilla Vasquez. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

#5

Mar 06, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/9/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

#6

Mar 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/6/2026: (Text Only Entry). Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order. In light of petitioner's pro se status, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with this order, to the United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of California by email at usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, 3/10/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025) or Rocha Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondents are directed to indicate in their opposition whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk APM) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

Mar 06, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Jose Hernan Bonilla Vasquez. (Deputy Clerk JAW)

Mar 06, 2026

Service by Mail

Mar 06, 2026

Minute Order

#7

Mar 07, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/07/2026)

Mar 09, 2026

Service by Mail

#9

Mar 11, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#10

Mar 11, 2026

Judgment

Mar 11, 2026

Service by Mail