Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-00717

#1

Mar 05, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Juan Jose Castillo Mongue. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

#2

Mar 05, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Juan Jose Castillo Mongue. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

#3

Mar 05, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/9/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

#4

Mar 05, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

#5

Mar 05, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/05/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The 1 petition appears to challenge petitioner's re-detention and raise legal issues that this Court has previously addressed. See e.g., Ramazan M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-CV-01356-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3145562 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025); R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01535-KES-EPG (HC), 2026 WL 40507 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2026); Omer G. G. v. Kaiser, No. 1:25-CV-01471-KES-SAB (HC), 2025 WL 3254999 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before March 9, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Ramazan M. v. Andrews, R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, and Omer G. G. v. Kaiser and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

Mar 05, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order, served on Juan Jose Castillo Mongue. (Deputy Clerk VMG)

Mar 05, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Juan Jose Castillo Mongue. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

Mar 05, 2026

Minute Order

Mar 05, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Mar 13, 2026

Order Dismissing Case AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

#8

Mar 13, 2026

Judgment

Mar 13, 2026

Service by Mail