District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-11109

#1

Mar 04, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11587970 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Pedro Antonio Cabrera Reyes. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Category Form)(Freidel, Irene) (Entered: 03/04/2026)

#2

Mar 04, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (SP) (Entered: 03/04/2026)

#3

Mar 04, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition and Stay of Transfer or Removal. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than March 18, 2026. (CAM) (Entered: 03/04/2026)

#4

Mar 04, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CAM) (Entered: 03/04/2026)

#5

Mar 04, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 3 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to Duty AUSA Canzoneri and Civil Process and mailed to Respondents on 3/4/2026. (CAM) (Entered: 03/04/2026)

Mar 04, 2026

Copy Mailed

Mar 04, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#6

Mar 05, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#7

Mar 18, 2026

Extension of Time

#8

Mar 18, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING 7 Assented-to Motion for Extension of Time up to and including March 20, 2026 to Repond to Habeas Petition. (CAM) (Entered: 03/18/2026)

Mar 18, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

#9

Mar 20, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#10

Mar 23, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Before the Court is Petitioner Pedro Antonio Cabrera Reyes’ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [ECF No. 1 ]. A declaration by Acting Assistant Field Office Director Brian E. Sullivan, [ECF No. 9-1 (“Sullivan Decl.”)], establishes the following. Petitioner is a Guatemalan citizen who was previously removed from the United States in June 2012. [Id. ¶¶ 6, 11]. In April 2019, Petitioner was again encountered in the United States. [Id. ¶ 12]. Petitioner’s removal order was reinstated, and he was released on an order of supervision. [Id. ¶ 13]. On February 5, 2026, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) encountered Petitioner near Warwick, Rhode Island, took him into custody, and served him with a Notice of Revocation of Release indicating that he was being re-detained to effectuate the reinstated removal order. [Id. ¶ 14]. ICE conducted an informal interview to allow Petitioner to respond to the revocation of release, and Petitioner did not provide a statement or documents at that time, but he did express a fear of returning to Guatemala. [Id.]. On March 5, 2026, a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) asylum officer conducted a reasonable fear interview with Petitioner and, on March 11, 2026, USCIS determined that Petitioner had not established a reasonable fear. [Id. ¶¶ 15–16]. Petitioner did not appeal this decision. [Id.]. Because Guatemala participates in the Electronic Nationality Verification (“ENV”) program, a travel document is not necessary for ICE to remove Petitioner to Guatemala, [id. ¶ 17], and Respondents are “prepared to expeditiously effectuate Petitioner’s removal to Guatemala” within one to two weeks after the Court’s current stay is lifted, [id. ¶ 19]. Petitioner alleges that he was redetained without proper revocation of his order of supervision, [ECF No. 1 at 13–15], and that his detention is unconstitutional because ICE cannot promptly effectuate his removal, [id. at 11–13]. The Sullivan Declaration, however, states that ICE conducted an interview to allow Petitioner to respond to the revocation of his release and that USCIS subsequently conducted a credible fear interview. [Sullivan Decl. ¶¶ 14–16]. Further, Respondents have indicated that they are able to promptly effectuate Petitioner’s removal through the ENV program after the Court’s current stay is lifted. [Id. ¶ 19]. Accordingly, Petitioner’s petition, [ECF No. 1 ], is DENIED. The Court’s order, [ECF No. 3 ], prohibiting Petitioner from being “deported, removed, or otherwise transferred outside the United States,” is hereby dissolved.(CAM) (Entered: 03/23/2026)

Mar 23, 2026

Order

#11

Mar 24, 2026

Order Dismissing Case