Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01739

(HC) Idarraga Montoya v. Chestnut

Completed

Case Information

Filed: March 03, 2026
Assigned to: Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: April 08, 2026
Last Activity: July 07, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Mar 03, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Moises Becerra, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Kristi Noem by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12984248) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Mar 03, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Attachments: # 1 Brief, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibits, # 4 Declaration, # 5 TRO Checklist, # 6 TRO Proposed Order, # 7 PI Proposed Order)(Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Mar 03, 2026
ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/6/2026. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#4
Mar 03, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#5
Mar 03, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/3/2026: The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim one of the 1 petition. See e.g., Ramazan M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-CV-01356-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3145562 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025); R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01535-KES-EPG (HC), 2026 WL 40507 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2026); Omer G. G. v. Kaiser, No. 1:25-CV-01471-KES-SAB (HC), 2025 WL 3254999 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before March 5, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Ramazan M. v. Andrews, R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, and Omer G. G. v. Kaiser and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (GM) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Mar 03, 2026
Minute Order
#6
Mar 05, 2026
OPPOSITION by Respondents Moises Becerra, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Kristi Noem to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 2 Exhibit Form I-213)(Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 03/05/2026)
Main Document: OPPOSITION
#7
Mar 09, 2026
REPLY by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya re 6 Opposition,. (Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#8
Apr 03, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 04/03/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#9
Apr 03, 2026
REQUEST FOR STATUS by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 04/03/2026)
Main Document: REQUEST
#10
Apr 08, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document: Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#11
Apr 08, 2026
Judgment
Main Document: Judgment
#12
May 06, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#13
May 06, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 5/06/2026: (Text Only Entry). After this case was closed, petitioner filed a 12 status report which requests that "this Court immediately release her consistent with the prior order and, in the alternative, find that she was provided a constitutionally deficient bond hearing that warrants immediate release as a remedy." Doc. 12 at 9. Petitioner's request in the form of a status report is procedurally improper. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1). Petitioner's request for relief in her 12 status report is denied without prejudice. (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
#14
May 06, 2026
Enforce Judgment
Main Document: Enforce Judgment
May 06, 2026
Minute Order
#15
May 11, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 5/11/2026: Respondents shall file a response to the 14 motion to enforce judgment by May 18, 2026. The response shall include a copy of any evidence that they submitted at the bond hearing, along with a transcript or an audio recording of the bond hearing. Petitioner may file a reply by May 21, 2026. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Entered: 05/11/2026)
May 11, 2026
Minute Order
#16
May 14, 2026
RESPONSE by Moises Becerra, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Kristi Noem to 14 Motion to Enforce Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 05/14/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#17
May 21, 2026
REPLY by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya re 16 Response. (Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#18
Jun 16, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document: Miscellaneous Relief
#19
Jun 16, 2026
Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Main Document: Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#20
Jul 06, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#21
Jul 07, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 7/07/2026: (Text Only Entry): The 14 motion to enforce the judgment is denied as moot. "For a habeas petition to continue to present a live controversy after the petitioner's release or deportation... there must be some remaining 'collateral consequence' that may be redressed by success on the petition." Abdala v. INS, 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal citation omitted). The 14 motion to enforce the judgment challenges only petitioner's detention. Petitioner has now departed the United States pursuant to an immigration judge's order granting her application for voluntary departure, see Doc. 20, and her departure "cur[es] [her] complaints about" her detention. Abdala, 488 F.3d at 1065. The 14 motion to enforce the judgment no longer presents a live controversy and is therefore moot. See id. (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 07/07/2026)
Jul 07, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Enforce Judgment