Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01739

#1

Mar 03, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Moises Becerra, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Kristi Noem by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12984248) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

#2

Mar 03, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya. (Attachments: # 1 Brief, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibits, # 4 Declaration, # 5 TRO Checklist, # 6 TRO Proposed Order, # 7 PI Proposed Order)(Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

#3

Mar 03, 2026

ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/6/2026. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

#4

Mar 03, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

#5

Mar 03, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/3/2026: The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim one of the 1 petition. See e.g., Ramazan M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-CV-01356-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3145562 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025); R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01535-KES-EPG (HC), 2026 WL 40507 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2026); Omer G. G. v. Kaiser, No. 1:25-CV-01471-KES-SAB (HC), 2025 WL 3254999 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before March 5, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Ramazan M. v. Andrews, R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, and Omer G. G. v. Kaiser and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (GM) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

Mar 03, 2026

Minute Order

#6

Mar 05, 2026

OPPOSITION by Respondents Moises Becerra, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Kristi Noem to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 2 Exhibit Form I-213)(Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

#7

Mar 09, 2026

REPLY by Alisson Briyid Idarraga Montoya re 6 Opposition,. (Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 03/09/2026)

#10

Apr 08, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#11

Apr 08, 2026

Judgment

#14

May 06, 2026

Enforce Judgment

May 06, 2026

Minute Order