Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01714
(HC) Singh v. Albarran
Active
Case Information
Filed: March 02, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
April 20, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 02, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Gurdev Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12978202) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit Proof I-589 filing)(Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Mar 02, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Gurdev Singh. (Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Main Document:
CIVIL
#3
Mar 02, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Gurdev Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Memorandum Points and Authorities)(Howard, Kyle) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#4
Mar 03, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 4/6/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#5
Mar 03, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Mar 04, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/4/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 3 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states he was detained on 3/12/2025, almost one year before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 3 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Four of the 1 Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 12:00 PM on 3/6/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 3/9/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Four only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the Petition and Motion by email to the U.S. Attorney's Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioner's Counsel shall do so by no later than 5:00 PM on 3/4/2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 03/04/2026)
#7
Mar 04, 2026
Certificate / Proof of Service
Main Document:
Certificate / Proof of Service
Mar 04, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
#8
Mar 05, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document:
Opposition to Motion
#9
Mar 06, 2026
DECLARATION of D.O. Juarez re 8 Opposition to Motion. Attorney Hemesath, Audrey Benison added. (Hemesath, Audrey) (Entered: 03/06/2026)
Main Document:
DECLARATION
Mar 24, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Apr 20, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Parties
Albarran
Party
(HC) Singh
Party