Southern District of California • 3:26-cv-01302

#1

Mar 02, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Gregory John Archambeault, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Warden of the Otay Mesa Detention Center ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-20846045.), filed by Samsoor Oriakhel. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - I-94, # 3 Exhibit B - Notice to Appear, # 4 Exhibit C - Additional Charges, # 5 Exhibit D - IJ Bond Denial Order, # 6 Exhibit E - I-285 Notice of Custody Determination)The new case number is 3:26-cv-1302-TWR-DEB. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Saccone, Kurt)(axc1) (axc1). (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#2

Mar 03, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. Petitioner alleges, among other things, that he is entitled to a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Respondents are ORDERED to respond to that allegation on or before March 6, 2026. (no document attached) (mxc) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

#3

Mar 03, 2026

Notice of Appearance

Mar 03, 2026

Order

#4

Mar 06, 2026

Return to Petition for Writ of H/C

#5

Mar 10, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Respondents concede that this case does not raise any material factual differences from the cases where this Court has found 1226(a) applies to the petitioner. The Petition is GRANTED IN PART and Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner a 1226(a) bond hearing no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. (no document attached) (mxc) (Entered: 03/10/2026)

Mar 10, 2026

Order

#6

Mar 24, 2026

MOTION to Enforce Judgment by Samsoor Oriakhel. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities Memorandum of Law, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Harith Mazrui, # 3 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Saccone, Kurt) (sjt). (Entered: 03/24/2026)

#7

Mar 24, 2026

MINUTE ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion 6 to Enforce Judgment. On March 10, 2026, the Court ordered Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing. Petitioner received a bond hearing and now seeks review of the immigration judge's denial of bond. While Petitioner's Motion states he is making a due process challenge, in reality, Petitioner is challenging the immigration judge's discretionary decision to deny bond based on the Petitioner's pending domestic violence criminal charges. This Court does not have jurisdiction to review this discretionary decision. See Prieto-Romero v. Clark, 534 F.3d 1053, 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) ("The alien may appeal the IJ's bond decision to the BIA, see 8 C.F.R. § 236.1(d)(3), but discretionary decisions granting or denying bond are not subject to judicial review."). Further, Petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by appealing to the BIA. See Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1161 (9th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion to Enforce Judgment is denied. (no document attached) (mxc) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

Mar 24, 2026

Order