Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01673

#1

Feb 28, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chesnut, Kristi Noem by Bisblack Jimenez Jean. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12971445) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Molina, Vanessa) (Entered: 02/28/2026)

#2

Feb 28, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Bisblack Jimenez Jean. (Molina, Vanessa) (Entered: 02/28/2026)

#3

Mar 02, 2026

Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider

#4

Mar 02, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Haddy Abouzeid, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Haddy Abouzeid, GOVT for Christopher Chesnut,Haddy Abouzeid, GOVT for Kristi Noem (Abouzeid, Haddy) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#5

Mar 02, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#6

Mar 02, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#7

Mar 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/06/2026. a.Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violations are proved, respondents will be served with the § 2241 petition and directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United States Attorney. Respondents are directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. If respondents dispute any factual representations in the operative petition, they shall include with the answer/return any and all documents necessary to support their view of the facts. Petitioner's reply/traverse, if any, is due within 7 days of being served a copy of the respondents' answer/return. Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER petitioner outside of this judicial district, pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which empowers the federal courts to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions...."); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that federal courts have the power to "to preserve the court's jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction pending review of an agency's action"). (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk JAA) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

Mar 06, 2026

Minute Order

#9

Mar 20, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#10

Mar 20, 2026

NOTICE of Recent Administrative Action in Support of 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Bisblack Jimenez Jean. (Molina, Vanessa) Modified on 3/25/2026 (KS). (Entered: 03/20/2026)

#11

Mar 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/20/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 3/24/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 3/25/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 03/20/2026)

Mar 20, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#12

Mar 24, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#13

Mar 25, 2026

REPLY in support of 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Bisblack Jimenez Jean. (Molina, Vanessa) Modified on 3/31/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 03/25/2026)

#14

Mar 25, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#15

Mar 25, 2026

Judgment