Middle District of Florida • 2:26-cv-00549

#1

Feb 27, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

#2

Feb 27, 2026

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Ivan Lozano Ramirez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rilo, Nora) (Entered: 02/27/2026)

#3

Mar 02, 2026

NEW CASE ASSIGNED to District Judge Kyle C. Dudek and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:26-cv-549-KCD-NPM. (ARL) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#4

Mar 02, 2026

Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Mar 02, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

#5

Mar 03, 2026

Order to show cause

#6

Mar 09, 2026

Proof of Service

#7

Mar 18, 2026

Notice of appearance

#8

Mar 23, 2026

Response to habeas petition

#9

Mar 23, 2026

Proof of Service

#10

Mar 23, 2026

Dismiss

#11

Mar 24, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER directing the Federal Respondents to respond to 10 the Warden's Motion to Dismiss. Response due by March 31, 2026. In doing so, they must specifically explain how their position in this case squares with the argument they routinely advance -- that the local warden is the sole proper respondent under Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-36 (2004). See, e.g., Roblero v. Warden, Florida Soft Side South, et al., No. 2:26-cv-91, Doc. 9 at 1 n.1 (M.D. Fla. 2026). Petitioner must file a response, if he wishes, by that date as well. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/24/2026. (BLW) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

Mar 24, 2026

Order

#12

Mar 25, 2026

Reply to response to petition

#13

Mar 26, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER denying 10 Respondent Warden Matthew Mordant's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for the reasons set forth in Jimenez v. Mordant, No. 2:26-cv-451-KCD-NPM, 2026 WL 820536 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2026). As the immediate custodian of Petitioner, Warden Mordant is a proper respondent to his habeas petition. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/26/2026. (BLW) (Entered: 03/26/2026)

Mar 26, 2026

Order on Motion to Dismiss

#14

Mar 30, 2026

Order

#15

Mar 31, 2026

Judgment - Prisoner