Active
Case Information
Filed: February 27, 2026
Assigned to:
Susan Prose
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Active
Last Activity:
March 10, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Feb 27, 2026
First APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10851888)Attorney Mayron Diaz Gallardo added to party Yaisel Ramon Zerquera Ramirez(pty:pet), filed by Yaisel Ramon Zerquera Ramirez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A NTA, Exhibit B Order of Release on Recognizance, Exhibit C Immigration Judge Bond Order, Exhibit D Immigration Judge Order on Motion to Pretermit I-589, Exhibit E Receipt for Appeal)(Diaz Gallardo, Mayron) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
Main Document:
First
#2
Feb 27, 2026
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
#3
Feb 27, 2026
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (echa, ) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
Main Document:
Magistrate
#4
Feb 27, 2026
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on February 27, 2026. Upon review of Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Petition"), which requests, inter alia, that the court "[o]rder that Petitioner shall not be transferred outside the District of Colorado while this petition is pending," Issue an Order to Show Cause ordering Respondents to show cause why this Petition should not be granted within 3 days, and "Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, either (1) ordering her immediate release, (2) requiring an individualized custody redetermination hearing with an immigration judge, and [d]eclare that Petitioners detention is unlawful," it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve Respondents with a copy of the 1 Petition, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and overnight mail, on or before March 3, 2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Within three days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the 1 Petition and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file a completed Magistrate Judge consent form (ECF No. 3 ) on or before March 6, 2026. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner outside of the jurisdiction of the District of Colorado pending resolution of the 1 Petition. Text Only Entry (sbplc9, ) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
#6
Feb 27, 2026
Utility Setting Deadline: Consent Form due by 3/6/2026 per ECF 4. (Text Only Entry) (ggill, ) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Feb 27, 2026
Order
#5
Mar 02, 2026
CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re 4 Order,,,,,, by Petitioner Yaisel Ramon Zerquera-Ramirez. (Diaz Gallardo, Mayron) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Main Document:
CERTIFICATE
#7
Mar 03, 2026
CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re 4 Order,,,,,, by Petitioner Yaisel Ramon Zerquera-Ramirez. (Diaz Gallardo, Mayron) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Main Document:
CERTIFICATE
#8
Mar 04, 2026
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Peter Andrew McNeilly on behalf of Juan Baltazar, Pamela Bondi, Robert Gaudian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi NoemAttorney Peter Andrew McNeilly added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Peter Andrew McNeilly added to party Pamela Bondi(pty:res), Attorney Peter Andrew McNeilly added to party Robert Gaudian(pty:res), Attorney Peter Andrew McNeilly added to party Todd M. Lyons(pty:res), Attorney Peter Andrew McNeilly added to party Kristi Noem(pty:res) (McNeilly, Peter) (Entered: 03/04/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#9
Mar 05, 2026
CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Yaisel Ramon Zerquera-Ramirez All parties consent.. (Diaz Gallardo, Mayron) (Entered: 03/05/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT
#10
Mar 05, 2026
ANSWER to Complaint by Juan Baltazar, Pamela Bondi, Robert Gaudian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(McNeilly, Peter) (Entered: 03/05/2026)
Main Document:
ANSWER
#11
Mar 06, 2026
REPLY to 10 Answer to Complaint by Petitioner Yaisel Ramon Zerquera-Ramirez. (Diaz Gallardo, Mayron) (Entered: 03/06/2026)
Main Document:
REPLY
#12
Mar 10, 2026
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, Local Civil Rules 40.1(c)(6) and 72.2, and 9 Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, this action is REFERRED for final disposition to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Judge Prose will conduct any and all further proceedings and order the entry of judgment in the case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 3/10/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
#13
Mar 10, 2026
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on March 10, 2026. The 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the "Petition") is GRANTED. The court notes that Respondents concede that the issues presented here are "not materially different from an issue this Court has resolved in a prior ruling in" Merchan-Pacheo v. Noem, No. 25-cv-3860-SBP, 2026 WL 88526 (D. Colo. Jan. 12, 2026). See also, e.g., Arenas v. Noem, No. 26-cv-24-SBP, 2026 WL 317562 (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2026). And Respondents also acknowledge that "until the Tenth Circuit rules on this issue, this Court's prior ruling on this issue would lead the Court to reach the same result here if the Court adheres to" the analysis articulated in Merchan-Pacheo. Moreover, the court notes that Respondents have cited no source of law binding upon this court in cursorily arguing that the court should reconsider its prior ruling. The court agrees with Respondents, though noting that Arenas presents an even more similar case to the facts alleged here. And the court finds that Respondents have provided the court with no reason to revisit its prior rulings at this time. Accordingly, the court refers the parties to its analyses in both Arenas, 2026 WL 317562, and Merchan-Pacheo, 2026 WL 88526, finding that the analyses provided in these cases apply in this matter and that accordingly, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing. The court therefore GRANTS Petitioner's request and orders Respondents to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing pursuant to Section 1226(a) no later than seven days from the date of this Order. Respondents are also ordered to file a status report in order to certify compliance within ten days of the issuance of this Order. If Petitioner has not been provided with such a bond hearing at the time this status report is due, he shall be immediately released. Text Only Entry (sbplc6, ) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
Mar 10, 2026
Order on Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge
Mar 10, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm