Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01595

#1

Feb 25, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, ICE-ERO, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, Warden, Golden State Annex by Luis Alberto Aguilera Perez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weiser, Anna) (Entered: 02/25/2026)

#2

Feb 25, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk SR) (Entered: 02/25/2026)

#3

Feb 25, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/25/2026)

Feb 25, 2026

PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12955324. (Weiser, Anna)

#4

Feb 27, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#5

Mar 06, 2026

Dismiss

#7

Mar 16, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 3/16/2026: Parties must review this MINUTE ORDER document, which are FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. [See attached for details.] Referred to District Judge Dena Coggins. Objections to these Findings and Recommendations due within 7 days. (Deputy Clerk SH)

#8

Mar 25, 2026

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/24/2026 ADOPTING the 7 findings and recommendations; GRANTING Petitioner's application for a 1 writ of habeas corpus on Count One based on a violation of petitioner's Fifth Amendment right to due process; DENYING Respondents' 5 motion to dismiss; Respondents shall RELEASE petitioner immediately from their custody with the same conditions he was subject to immediately prior to his redete ntion; and If the government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days of notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk RRB)

#9

Mar 25, 2026

Judgment