Completed
Case Information
Filed: October 02, 2025
Assigned to:
Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: December 17, 2025
Last Activity:
December 17, 2025
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Oct 02, 2025
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-5592349.), filed by PANTELEON RAMIREZ CHAVEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Dwyer, Paul) (Entered: 10/02/2025)
Main Document:
PETITION
#2
Oct 03, 2025
TEXT ORDER re 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. To maintain the status quo, and solely so that the Court can make an informed decision about its authority to issue relief and whether any relief that it has the power to issue should be granted, the respondents are temporarily enjoined from removing the petitioner from the United States. Additionally, so that the petitioner can fully participate in these proceedings and maintain adequate access to legal counsel, the respondents also are enjoined from transferring the petitioner outside the Western District of New York. See Perez y Perez v. Noem, 2025 WL 1908284, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 13, 2025) (collecting cases). The Court will promptly schedule a status conference. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 10/3/2025. (RFI) (Entered: 10/03/2025)
#3
Oct 03, 2025
TEXT ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Panteleon Ramirez Chavez. Status Conference set for 10/6/2025 at 11:00 AM in U.S. District Court, Niagara Courtroom, 8th Floor West, 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, NY before Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. PLEASE NOTE: The proceeding described herein will be held remotely. Dial-in instructions will be emailed directly to the parties. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 10/3/2025. (RFI) (Entered: 10/03/2025)
Oct 03, 2025
Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (JLH)
Oct 03, 2025
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JLH)
#4
Oct 05, 2025
NOTICE of Appearance by Adam A. Khalil on behalf of All Defendants (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 10/05/2025)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#5
Oct 06, 2025
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo: Status Conference re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Panteleon Ramirez Chavez held on 10/6/2025. Court ordered that this proceeding is not to be recorded, or taped in any way. If someone does record it, they will be found in contempt of court. Court reviewed application and set briefing schedule as follows: Respondents' response is due by 11/20/2025. Petitioner's reply is due by 12/1/2025. If necessary, oral argument will be scheduled by the Court. Appearances by Teams Video Conference. For petitioner: Paul J. O'Dwyer. For respondents: AUSA Adam A. Khalil. (Court Reporter Ann M. Sawyer.) (CMD) (Entered: 10/06/2025)
#6
Nov 05, 2025
TEXT ORDER: On November 4, 2025, this Court issued a decision and order in Alvarez Ortiz v. Noem, Case No. 25-cv-960, Docket Item 16 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2025), finding that noncitizens who are present in the United States without having been admitted or paroled are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) but instead are subject to detention under section 1226. Accordingly, the respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before November 14, 2025, why, in light of that decision, (1) the petition in this case should not be granted, and (2) the Court should not order that the petitioner receive a bond hearing at which the government bears the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk and at which the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, the petitioner's ability to pay. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 11/5/2025. (RFI) (Entered: 11/05/2025)
#7
Nov 13, 2025
REPLY/RESPONSE to re 6 Text Order,,,, filed by Pamela Bondi, Jane Doe, John Doe, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 11/13/2025)
Main Document:
REPLY/RESPONSE
#8
Nov 18, 2025
TEXT ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Panteleon Ramirez Chavez. On November 5, 2025, this Court ordered the respondents to show cause "why, in light of [this Court's] decision [in Alvarez Ortiz v. Noem, Case No. 25-cv-960, Docket Item 16 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2025)], (1) the petition in this case should not be granted, and (2) the Court should not order that the petitioner receive a bond hearing at which the government bears the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk and at which the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, the petitioner's ability to pay." Docket Item 6. In response, the "[r]espondents acknowledge[d] that this Court's prior rulings [including Alvarez Ortiz] concerning similar challenges to the government policy or practice at issue in this case, and the common question of law between this case and those rulings, would control the result in this case should the Court adhere to its legal reasoning in those prior decisions." Docket Item 7 at 1. The respondents have reserved all rights, including the right to appeal, and this Court appreciates their efforts "to conserve judicial and party resources" by not rehashing issues that this Court already has decided. See id. Accordingly, for the reasons explained in Alvarez Ortiz, this Court GRANTS the petition and ORDERS the respondents to provide the petitioner, Panteleon Ramirez Chavez, with an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge within seven calendar days of the date of this order. At that hearing, the government shall bear the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk. At that bond hearing, the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, the petitioner's ability to pay. If the respondents fail to provide such a hearing within seven calendar days, they shall immediately release the petitioner. On or before November 26, 2025, the respondents shall file a status report confirming that the petitioner has either been granted a bond hearing in compliance with this order or released from custody. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 11/18/2025. (RFI) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
#9
Nov 19, 2025
Letter filed by Jane Doe, Kristi Noem, Todd Lyons, John Doe, Pamela Bondi re bond hearing. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 11/19/2025)
Main Document:
Letter
#10
Dec 01, 2025
TEXT ORDER re 9 Letter filed by Kristi Noem, John Doe, Jane Doe, Todd Lyons, Pamela Bondi. The respondents have filed a letter, Docket Item 9, indicating that an immigration judge held a bond hearing in compliance with this Court's order, Docket Item 8, and that the petitioner was ordered released on bond. If the petitioner believes there are any further issues properly before this Court, he may show cause within 14 days of this order. If the petitioner does not show cause why issues remain before this Court within 14 days, the Clerk of Court shall close this case without further order. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 12/1/2025. (RFI)Clerk to Follow up (Entered: 12/01/2025)
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney