District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-10966

Candido De Freitas v. Moniz

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 24, 2026
Assigned to: Indira Talwani
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: March 03, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 24, 2026
Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11569538 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Felipe Candido De Freitas. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Qirici, Enxhi) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Feb 25, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (CM) (Entered: 02/25/2026)
#3
Feb 25, 2026
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (SEC) (Entered: 02/25/2026)
Main Document: Service Order-2241 Petition
#4
Feb 25, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (SEC) (Entered: 02/25/2026)
Main Document: General Order 19-02
Feb 25, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#5
Feb 26, 2026
Extension of Time
Main Document: Extension of Time
#6
Feb 27, 2026
Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER granting nunc pro tunc Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Habeas Petition [ 5 ]. Respondents' time to answer Petitioner's Petition [ 1 ] is extended to today, February 27, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.. (SEC) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
#7
Feb 27, 2026
Response - not related to a motion
Main Document: Response - not related to a motion
Feb 27, 2026
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
#8
Mar 03, 2026
Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER: Respondents' Opposition to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ 7 ] states that Petitioner "is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a)... and is eligible for a bond hearing." Opp'n 1 [ 7 ]. Respondents further note that "Petitioner does not allege that he has requested a bond hearing." Id. Respondents contend the Petition should therefore be dismissed "for Petitioner's failure to exhaust his administrative remedy[.]" Id. at 2. Where Petitioner requests that the court order his "immediate release... or require that he be provided a bond hearing[,]" Pet. ECF 7 [ 1 ], but has not indicated whether he has requested such a hearing from Respondents, Petitioner shall file a Reply with this court no later than March 6, 2026, indicating whether a bond hearing was requested, and, if not, showing cause as to why the court should not dismiss this Petition for failure to exhaust remedies. (SEC) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Mar 03, 2026
Order