Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01551
(HC) Aguilar Carbajal v. Noem
Active
Case Information
Filed: February 24, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
February 27, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Feb 18, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-41529334 for $5 filing fee, filed by Plaintiff Elkin Josue Aguilar Carbajal. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet CV-071, # 2 TRO) (Attorney Mardy Sproule added to party Elkin Josue Aguilar Carbajal(pty:bkmov))(Sproule, Mardy) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Main Document:
PETITION
#2
Feb 18, 2026
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#3
Feb 18, 2026
First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Writ of Habeas Corpus TRO filed by Plaintiff Elkin Josue Aguilar Carbajal. (Sproule, Mardy) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Main Document:
First
#4
Feb 18, 2026
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Elkin Josue Aguilar Carbajal, re First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Writ of Habeas Corpus TRO 3, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 1 Proof of Service served on 02/18/2026. (Sproule, Mardy) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Main Document:
PROOF
#5
Feb 19, 2026
ORDER RE TRANSFER to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 5:25-cv-01873-SSS-(BFM) (dve) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/19/2026)
Main Document:
ORDER
#6
Feb 19, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani: The parties are therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing and with supporting evidence, no later than Febmary 20, 2026, at 5:00 p.m., as to why this matter should not be transferred to the Eastern District of California. Failure to file a response by that deadline will be deemed consent to the transfer. (see document for further details) (bm) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/19/2026)
Main Document:
MINUTE
#7
Feb 19, 2026
REPLY Response to Order to Show Cause Reply to Doc 6 filed by Petitioner Elkin Josue Aguilar Carbajal. (Sproule, Mardy) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/19/2026)
Main Document:
REPLY
#8
Feb 20, 2026
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITION TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani: The Court finds that the interests of justice would be served by transferring this action to the Eastern District of California. The Court VACATES all pending pre-trial dates and deadlines and TRANSFERS this action to the Eastern District of California. This matter is now CLOSED in this district. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) [Transferred from cacd on 2/24/2026.] (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#9
Feb 24, 2026
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:26-cv-01700. (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Main Document:
Case Transferred In - District Transfer
#10
Feb 24, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#11
Feb 24, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/24/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, no later than tomorrow, 2/25/2025, by 5:00 PM, petitioner's counsel is DIRECTED (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with this order, to the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California by email at usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov; and (2) to promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Thursday, 12/26/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from the prior decisions in P.A.H.E. v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01164-DJC-JDP, 2026 WL 451662 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2026), Salvador v. Bondi, No. 2:25-cv-07946-MRA-MAA, 2025 WL 2995055 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondents are directed to indicate in their opposition whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk JRM) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
#12
Feb 24, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
Feb 24, 2026
Minute Order
#13
Feb 26, 2026
Certificate / Proof of Service
Main Document:
Certificate / Proof of Service
Feb 26, 2026
Minute Order
#16
Feb 27, 2026
Certificate / Proof of Service
Main Document:
Certificate / Proof of Service
Parties
(HC) Aguilar Carbajal
Party
Noem
Party