Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-00310

#1

Feb 23, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number APAWDC-9382583), filed by DIEGO ANDRES VARGAS-MARTINEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Certificate of Service) (Campos, Jose) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#2

Feb 23, 2026

CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by DIEGO ANDRES VARGAS-MARTINEZ. (Campos, Jose) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

Feb 24, 2026

Judge Stephanie L. Haines added. (bmh)

#3

Feb 25, 2026

Case Management Order

#4

Feb 27, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Compliance re 3 Case Management Order,,,,, by Jose C Campos on behalf of DIEGO ANDRES VARGAS-MARTINEZ (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A.email) (Campos, Jose) (Entered: 02/27/2026)

#5

Mar 02, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Joanne Reed on behalf of PAMELA JO BONDI, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO. (Reed, Joanne) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#6

Mar 28, 2026

RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PAMELA JO BONDI, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Reed, Joanne) (Entered: 03/28/2026)

#7

Jun 17, 2026

NOTICE of Suggestion of Mootness by PAMELA JO BONDI, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Reed, Joanne) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#8

Jun 22, 2026

TEXT ORDER. Respondents filed 7 Notice of Suggestion of Mootness informing the Court that Petitioner was granted voluntary departure from the United States on April 30, 2026 (See ECF No. 7). It is a well-established principle that federal courts lack jurisdiction to decide an issue unless it presents a live case or controversy as required by Article III, § 2, of the Const. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). "To invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court, a litigant must have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision." Burkey v. Marberry, 556 F.3d 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2009) (quoting Lewis v. Contl Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990) (citing Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 750-51 (1984), and Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 471-73 (1982)). "The case or controversy requirement continues through all stages of federal judicial proceedings, trial and appellate, and requires that parties have a personal stake in the outcome." Id. (citing Lewis, 494 U.S. at 477-78). Thus, if developments occur during the litigation that eliminate a petitioner's personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from granting effective relief, the case must be dismissed as moot. See id. at 147-48; Keitel v. Mazurkiewicz, 729 F.3d 278, 280 (3d Cir. 2013). Given Petitioner's departure, there is no remedy that the Court can provide. Therefore, the Petition and any pending motions are moot. Based on Petitioner's departure the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is Dismissed with prejudice as moot and the case is closed. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 6/22/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cag) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

Jun 22, 2026

Order