Middle District of Florida • 2:26-cv-00482

#1

Feb 23, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt number 17370) filed by Adalberto Fiandor-Fuentes. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits, # 2 Letter to the Clerk) Received via Intake; no envelope. (FLY) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#2

Feb 23, 2026

ORDER to show cause why Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) should not be granted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order, the Petition, with exhibits (Doc. 1) electronically to the United States Attorney's Office in Tampa, Florida (USAFLM.Alcatraz@usdoj.gov) and by certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C (U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20530-0001). The Clerk is further DIRECTED to remove the JaxP-7 flag from this case. Petitioner is also directed to serve this order on Respondents by March 2, 2026, and file proof of service. Petitioner does not need to obtain a summons to do so. Respondents are DIRECTED to Show Cause by 3/16/2026. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 2/23/2026. (CGW) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#3

Mar 04, 2026

Proof of Service

#4

Mar 16, 2026

Notice of appearance

#5

Mar 16, 2026

Response to habeas petition

#6

Mar 16, 2026

Dismiss

#7

Mar 17, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER directing the Federal Respondents to respond to 6 the Warden's Motion to Dismiss. Response due by March 24, 2026. In doing so, they must specifically explain how their position in this case squares with the argument they routinely advance -- that the local warden is the sole proper respondent under Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-36 (2004). See, e.g., Roblero v. Warden, Florida Soft Side South, et al., No. 2:26-cv-91, Doc. 9 at 1 n.1 (M.D. Fla. 2026). Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/17/2026. (BLW) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

Mar 17, 2026

Order

#9

Mar 24, 2026

Extension of Time to File Response / Reply

#10

Mar 25, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER granting 9 Motion for Extension of Time. By April 3, 2026, Federal Respondents will respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier on 3/25/2026. (BRH) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

Mar 25, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply

#11

Mar 26, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER denying 6 Respondent Warden's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for the reasons set forth in Jimenez v. Mordant, No. 2:26-cv-451-KCD-NPM, 2026 WL 820536 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2026). As the immediate custodian of Petitioner, Warden is a proper respondent to his habeas petition. Signed by District Judge Kyle C. Dudek on 3/26/2026. (BLW) (Entered: 03/26/2026)

Mar 26, 2026

Order on Motion to Dismiss

#12

Apr 13, 2026

Notice (Other)

#15

Apr 21, 2026

Order

#16

Apr 22, 2026

Judgment