Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01535

(HC) Ubeda Melgara v. Golden State Annex Detention Facility

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 23, 2026
Assigned to: Troy Lynne Nunley
Referred to: Jeremy D. Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity: February 24, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 23, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden Golden State Annex Detention Facility by Jose Gustavo Ubeda Melgara. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12945218) (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Feb 23, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Gustavo Ubeda Melgara. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Feb 23, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Jose Gustavo Ubeda Melgara. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
Main Document: CIVIL
#4
Feb 23, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk LAO) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#5
Feb 23, 2026
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Jose Gustavo Ubeda Melgara re 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 3 Civil Cover Sheet. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
Main Document: Certificate / Proof of Service
#6
Feb 24, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on February 24, 2026: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). (ECF No. 2 .) The Court has reviewed Petitioner's motion and finds Petitioner has met his burden establishing a TRO is warranted under the factors articulated in Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Petitioner has established: (1) a likelihood of success on his claims that Respondents violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; (2) Petitioner will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO; (3) the balance of equities tip in Petitioner's favor; and (4) a TRO is in the public interest. The Court has repeatedly ruled on the issues presented in the instant case. See, e.g., Morales-Flores v. Lyons, No. 1:25-CV-01640-TLN-EFB, 2025 WL 3552841, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2025). Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for TRO is GRANTED. To return Petitioner to the status quo ante litem, Respondents are ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner under the same conditions he was released prior to his current detention. At the time of release, Respondents must return all of Petitioner's documents and possessions. Respondents are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner absent compliance with constitutional protections, including seven-days' notice and a pre-deprivation hearing. Respondents are further ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not grant the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and enter judgment in favor of Petitioner. Respondents shall file responsive papers by March 3, 2026. Petitioner may file a reply by March 9, 2026. The parties shall indicate whether they request a hearing. Petitioner shall immediately serve this Order and Petitioner's A# on Respondents with a copy via email to: usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. Respondents may apply to the Court for modification or dissolution of the TRO on two days' notice to Petitioner. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(4). The bond requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c) is waived. SO ORDERED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Feb 24, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO