Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-00543

#1

Feb 23, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#2

Feb 23, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#3

Feb 23, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#4

Feb 23, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Camilo Rodriguez, GOVT for Warden, California City Correctional Center (Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#5

Feb 23, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

Feb 23, 2026

RECEIPT number 200017218 for $5.00 for filing fee from Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

Feb 23, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Deputy Clerk AJB)

Feb 23, 2026

Service by Mail

Feb 24, 2026

RECEIPT number 200017218 for $5.00 for filing fee from Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Deputy Clerk VLK)

#6

Feb 25, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 2/25/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, Doc. No. 11 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 2/26/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 3/9/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 02/25/2026)

Feb 25, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 6, served on Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Feb 25, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

Feb 25, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Feb 26, 2026

OPPOSITION to 2 Motion for TRO by Respondents; RESPONSE/ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit: Form I-213 12/9/2025, # 2 Exhibit: Form I-213 6/7/2023, # 3 Exhibit: RAP Sheet)(Rodriguez, Camilo) Modified on 2/27/2026 (KLY). (Entered: 02/26/2026)

#8

Feb 26, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service

#9

Mar 12, 2026

SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE in Support of 1 Petition and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 03/13/2026)

#10

Mar 24, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 3/24/2026: In Respondents' 7 Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents contend that Petitioner is subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b). Respondents differentiate this case from the recent decisions by this court in Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026), by arguing that Petitioner should remain in detention due to his criminal record. (Doc. No. 7 at 2.) Respondents do not contend that this criminal record renders him subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). (Id.) As this court has previously held, where the Government argues that a noncitizen's continued detention pending removal proceedings is warranted due to a non-pretextual change in circumstance, such as a recent arrest, the proper remedy is a bond hearing where the parties may present their respective arguments before an immigration judge. See Calvillo v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00569-DC-CSK, 2026 WL 253627, at *3. Thus, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Alvarez Maciel, Barajas Ortiz, and Calvillo, Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner a bond hearing before a neutral arbiter, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order; and (2) if Petitioner is not provided a bond hearing within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of this Order, he shall be released from Respondents' custody. This Order does not address the circumstances in which Respondents may detain Petitioner in the event Petitioner becomes subject to an executable final order of removal and Petitioner receives notice of that final order of removal. This case is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

Mar 24, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 10, served on Rigo Hibhrahim Silva Parra. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Mar 24, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

Mar 24, 2026

Service by Mail

#11

May 01, 2026

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

#15

May 06, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#16

May 06, 2026

In Forma Pauperis

#17

May 06, 2026

Appoint Counsel

May 06, 2026

Service by Mail

May 06, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#19

May 07, 2026

Dismiss