Central District of California • 5:26-cv-00856

#1

Feb 22, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-41563816 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Shubham. (Attachments: # 1 Evidence, # 2 Civil Coversheet) (Attorney Simranjit Kaur added to party Shubham(pty:pet))(Kaur, Simranjit) (Entered: 02/22/2026)

#2

Feb 22, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET (CV71) filed as MOTION Receipt No: ACACDC-41563837 - Fee: $405, filed by Petitioner Shubham. (Attachments: # 1 Checklist, # 2 Evidence, # 3 Attorney Dec)(Kaur, Simranjit) Modified on 2/22/2026 (et). (Entered: 02/22/2026)

#3

Feb 22, 2026

NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) (Entered: 02/22/2026)

#4

Feb 22, 2026

[DOCKET BY CLERK] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDR filed by Petitioner Shubham. (et) (Entered: 02/22/2026)

#5

Feb 22, 2026

[DOCKET BY CLERK] DECLARATION FOR ATTORNEY SIMRANJIT KAUR filed by Petitioner Shubham. (et) (Entered: 02/22/2026)

#6

Feb 22, 2026

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect Event was selected in the e-filing of the Motion for TRO and Declaration of Attorney. The Clerk has re-docketed the documents under the correct Event. (et) (Entered: 02/22/2026)

#7

Feb 23, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner Shubham's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. Dkt. No. 4 . Respondents are ORDERED to file a response by Wednesday, February 25, at 5 PM. Petitioner may file a Reply by Thursday, February 26, at 5 PM. Respondents are ORDERED not to remove Petitioner from this District pending resolution of the Motion. Furthermore, pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office set forth in Appendix C to the Central District of California Local Civil Rules, this Order constitutes service of the Motion on the Respondents. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/23/2026)

Feb 23, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#8

Feb 24, 2026

Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held

#9

Feb 25, 2026

Attorney Appearance or Reassignment for the USA

#10

Feb 25, 2026

Motion Related Document

#11

Feb 27, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#12

Mar 03, 2026

Status Report

#13

Mar 05, 2026

Response

#14

Mar 13, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong:Petitioner, through counsel, filed an Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order requesting his release and related relief. Dkt. No. 4 . Although Petitioner did not explicitly seek a preliminary injunction, this Court issued an order granting the TRO as requested and also ordered the Respondents to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Dkt. No. 11 . The Court ordered the parties to file a joint status report regarding Respondents' compliance with the TRO and set a briefing schedule for the OSC. Dkt. No. 11 . Respondents filed a status report advising that Petitioner was released in accordance with the TRO. Dkt. No. 12 . Respondents also filed a Response to the OSC arguing that Petitioners release rendered the contemplated preliminary injunctionand indeed the entire habeas petitionmoot. Dkt. No. 13 . Petitioner did not file a Reply in support of his initial Motion, did not participate in the status report regarding his relief, and did not file a Reply in support of the Order to Show Cause. The Court does not find that this case is moot, but it does appear that Petitioner does not wish to seek a preliminary injunction. Thus, the TRO is dissolved, the OSC is discharged, and no preliminary injunction shall issue. The parties are directed to follow the orders of the Magistrate Judge with respect to further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/13/2026)

Mar 13, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#15

Mar 18, 2026

Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held

#16

Mar 26, 2026

Reply (Motion related)

#17

Mar 31, 2026

Response

#18

Apr 10, 2026

Order to Show Cause

#19

Apr 23, 2026

Appearance

#20

Apr 28, 2026

Judgment

#21

Apr 30, 2026

Order

#22

Apr 30, 2026

Judgment