Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01474

#1

Feb 20, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Current or Acting United States Attorney General, Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security by Jonnathan Steven Marin Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

#2

Feb 20, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jonnathan Steven Marin Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

#3

Feb 20, 2026

Appoint Counsel

#4

Feb 20, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED under a PSEUDONYM by Jonnathan Steven Marin Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

#5

Feb 20, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jonnathan Steven Marin Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

#6

Feb 20, 2026

ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Jonnathan Steven Marin Rodriguez signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/20/2026. (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

#7

Feb 20, 2026

Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider

#8

Feb 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 2/20/2026: The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The 1 petition appears to challenge petitioner's re-detention and raise legal issues that this Court has previously addressed. See e.g., Sergio S.M. v. Noem,No. 1:25-CV-01973-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3768206 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2025); R.D.T.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01141-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 2686866 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 18, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before February 24, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Sergio S.M. v. Noem and R.D.T.M. v. Wofford and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order, the petition, and the motion for temporary restraining order on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, with a copy to usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. (Voyles, Julien) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

Feb 20, 2026

Minute Order

Feb 20, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Prisoner New Case Documents, 6 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Jonnathan Steven Marin Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SSA)

Feb 20, 2026

Service by Mail