Completed
Case Information
Filed: February 19, 2026
Assigned to:
William Shaw Stickman IV
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Completed: March 11, 2026
Last Activity:
April 13, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Feb 19, 2026
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by INGRID HENDRIKA MARKS. (Attachments: # 1 Habeas Petition lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet, # 5 Envelope) (tla) (Entered: 02/19/2026)
Main Document:
Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Feb 19, 2026
Judge William S. Stickman added. (tla)
#2
Feb 25, 2026
ORDER OF COURT. 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the petition. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 02/25/26. A copy of this order will be mailed to Petitioner this day, 02/25/26. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) (Entered: 02/25/2026)
#3
Feb 25, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (for Clerk of Court personnel only)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (for Clerk of Court personnel only)
Feb 25, 2026
Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#4
Feb 26, 2026
Case Management Order
Main Document:
Case Management Order
#5
Mar 02, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E. Skirtich on behalf of LEONARD ODDO. (Skirtich, Paul) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#6
Mar 03, 2026
SCHEDULING ORDER. Response to 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus due by 03/10/26. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/03/26. A copy of this order will be mailed to Petitioner this day, 03/03/26. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
Mar 03, 2026
Order Response/Briefing Schedule
#7
Mar 09, 2026
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LEONARD ODDO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I) (Skirtich, Paul) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#8
Mar 11, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#9
Mar 11, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Main Document:
Judgment (Rule 58)
#10
Mar 25, 2026
NOTICE by INGRID HENDRIKA MARKS re 6 Response/Briefing Schedule, (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (tla) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#11
Mar 25, 2026
Alter Judgment AND Reconsideration
Main Document:
Alter Judgment AND Reconsideration
#12
Mar 26, 2026
ORDER DENYING 11 Motion for Reconsideration/Motion to Alter Judgment. The Court holds that there is no reason to disturb its 8 9 03/11/2026, Orders. No intervening change in the controlling law has occurred. There is no clear error of law or fact that the Court must correct. There is no mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. And there is no fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party. While Petitioner might believe that she has come forth with a reason that justifies relief, the Court disagrees. It holds steadfast in its decision that the 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was properly denied as Petitioner's detention pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) without bond has not become unreasonable and does not violate due process. A copy of this Order will be sent by first-class mail to Petitioner at her address of record this day. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/26/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (rgm) (Entered: 03/26/2026)
Mar 26, 2026
Order on Motion for Reconsideration AND Order on Motion to Alter Judgment
#13
Apr 08, 2026
NOTICE by INGRID HENDRIKA MARKS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Envelope) (tla) (Entered: 04/09/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#14
Apr 09, 2026
Alternative Service AND Reconsideration
Main Document:
Alternative Service AND Reconsideration
#15
Apr 13, 2026
ORDER DENYING 14 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons previously set forth, the Court remains steadfast in its holding that Petitioner's detention has not become unreasonable and does not violate due process. A copy of this order will be sent by first-class mail to Petitioner at her address of record this day. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 04/13/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (rgm) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Apr 13, 2026
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
Parties
MARKS
Party
ODDO
Party