Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-01050

#1

Feb 18, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-21421476), filed by Leogelis Chiquinquira Bravo Puche. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Galvez, Felix) (Entered: 02/18/2026)

#2

Feb 18, 2026

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Leogelis Chiquinquira Bravo Puche. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Galvez, Felix) (Entered: 02/18/2026)

Feb 18, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (rqr)

Feb 18, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rqr)

Feb 19, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Feb 19, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

#3

Feb 20, 2026

Order

#4

Feb 20, 2026

Order

#5

Feb 20, 2026

Certified Mail Receipt

#6

Feb 24, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#7

Feb 27, 2026

Response

#8

Mar 09, 2026

Certified Mail Receipt

#9

Apr 30, 2026

Judgment on the Pleadings

#10

May 13, 2026

TEXT ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS and MOOTING 9 Petitioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Petitioner claims that Respondents have violated procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment based on a significant presence in the United States and/or an improper revocation of release. Respondents have submitted a response in opposition. After reviewing the briefing, provided evidence, and applicable law, the Court grants the petition based on the law as set out and analyzed in Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, ___, No 5:26-CV-0728-JKP, 2026 WL 809441 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026) and numerous other cases decided by the undersigned. While there are differences between this case and Longoria Mendoza, none warrant a different result. For reasons previously stated in Longoria Mendoza, the Court finds that (1) it has jurisdiction to consider the arguments presented in the instant habeas petition; (2) any asserted failure to exhaust administrative remedies is excused; (3) Respondents have violated Petitioner's procedural due process rights; and (4) fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are not available in habeas corpus proceedings like this one. The Court treats the instant action solely as a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and declines to consider any claim other than the alleged violation of procedural due process. The Court has considered the arguments Respondents make in response and rejects them for reasons stated in prior cases. However, the Court accepts their argument that the parole in this case automatically terminated prior to the arrest and detention of Petitioner. Petitioner did not contest the argument and documentation supports it. Still, under the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court concludes Petitioner's detention is unlawful, and habeas relief is proper. Accordingly, the Court grants the petition. Given this ruling, it moots the motion. Because Petitioner has no criminal history, has established a significant presence in the United States that requires due process protection, and there is no indication of flight risk or danger to the community, it is ORDERED that on or before May 15, 2026, Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner Leogelis Chiquinquira Bravo Puche from custody to a public location, under appropriate conditions of release. Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner's counsel of the exact location and exact time of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. Any possible or anticipated removal or transfer of Petitioner under this present detention is PROHIBITED. Respondents shall FILE a Status Report no later than May 16, 2026, confirming that Petitioner has been released. If counsel for Petitioner disagrees with any aspect of the filed Status Report, counsel may file a separate Status Report. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rw) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

May 13, 2026

Order on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

#11

May 14, 2026

Judgment

#12

May 16, 2026

Status Report