Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01352

(HC) Carcamo-Ortiz v. Noem

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 17, 2026
Assigned to: Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity: February 27, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 17, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Orestes Cruz, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem by Dania Yamileth Carcamo Ortiz. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12914225) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, Petitioners grant of CAT withholding of removal, # 2 Exhibit 2, Petitioners EAD approval notice, # 3 Exhibit 3, G28 for Petitioner, # 4 Exhibit 4, DHS Response to Attempts to Locate Petitioner, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herndon, Megan) (Entered: 02/17/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Feb 17, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/23/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk SR) (Entered: 02/17/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#3
Feb 17, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Pamela Bondi,Anthony Andrews for Christopher Chestnut,Anthony Andrews for Orestes Cruz,Anthony Andrews for Todd Lyons,Anthony Andrews for Kristi Noem (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 02/17/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#4
Feb 17, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/17/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#5
Feb 23, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/23/2026: (Text Only Entry).A review of the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action reveals that petitioner appears to request emergency relief in the form of a preliminary injunction. If petitioner seeks emergency relief, she is DIRECTED to file a motion for temporary restraining order no later than 5:00 PM on 2/25/2026. (Deputy Clerk CGH) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
Feb 23, 2026
Minute Order
#6
Feb 25, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#7
Feb 26, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/26/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 6 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 6 motion for temporary restraining order. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 6 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM tomorrow, 2/27/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from the decisions in Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025), A.A.M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-cv-01514-DC-DMC (HC), 2025 WL 3485219 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025), or D.V.D. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., No. 1:25-cv-10676-BEM, Doc. No. 241 (D. Mass. Feb. 25, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondents are directed to indicate in their opposition whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk JRM) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Feb 26, 2026
Minute Order
#8
Feb 27, 2026
RESPONSE by Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Orestes Cruz, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem to 6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order,, 7 Minute Order,,,,,,, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,. (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE

Parties

(HC) Carcamo-Ortiz
Party
Noem
Party