Southern District of California • 3:26-cv-00967

#1

Feb 15, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Pamela Bondi, Daniel A. Brightman, Christopher LaRose, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-20791466.), filed by Tynchtykbek Pridinov. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:26-cv-967-TWR-DDL. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (McGoldrick, Brian)(sjt) (Entered: 02/17/2026)

#2

Feb 18, 2026

Order to Show Cause

#3

Feb 18, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#4

Feb 21, 2026

Affidavit of Service

#5

Feb 23, 2026

Return to Petition for Writ of H/C

#6

Feb 25, 2026

NOTICE of Change of Hearing (TIME ONLY): Order to Show Cause Hearing reset for 2/26/2026 2:00 PM in Courtroom 14A before Judge Todd W. Robinson. (no document attached) (sxm3) (Entered: 02/25/2026)

Feb 25, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings AND ~Util - Terminate Hearings

#7

Feb 26, 2026

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Todd W. Robinson: Show Cause Hearing held on 2/26/2026. The Court has considered the six-factor test set forth in Banda v. McAleenan, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1099 (W.D. Wash. 2019). Applying that test to the record in this case, the Court concludes that Petitioner is entitled to an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with that hearing within the next 14 days. (Court Reporter/ECR Chari Bowery). (Plaintiff Attorney Brian McGoldrick). (Defendant Attorney AUSA Robbin Lee). (no document attached) (jao) (Entered: 02/26/2026)

Feb 26, 2026

Show Cause Hearing

#8

Mar 05, 2026

Status Report

#9

Mar 06, 2026

Status Report

#10

Mar 10, 2026

MINUTE ORDER Clarifying ECF No. 7 . On February 26, 2026, the Court ordered that "Petitioner is entitled to an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge." In response to the Parties' Status Reports, (see ECF Nos. 8 (Petitioner's Status Report), 9 (Respondents' Status Report)), the Court clarifies that Petitioner's individualized bond hearing was not ordered under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), but rather as required to comport with due process under the United States Constitution in light of Petitioner's prolonged mandatory detention. Because Matter of Q Li, 29 I&N Dec. 66 (BIA 2025), does not apply here, the Immigration Judge SHALL CONDUCT an individualized bond hearing, and the Government SHALL BEAR the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk if released. See, e.g., Order Granting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus at 7-11 & n.2, Sandesh v. LaRose, No. 26-cv-846 JES DDL (S.D. Cal. filed Mar. 5, 2026), ECF No. 13 (collecting cases). (no document attached) (sxd) (Entered: 03/10/2026)

Mar 10, 2026

Order