Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-00249

DIEZ CANSECO v. WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 16, 2026
Assigned to: Christy Chriswell Wiegand
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Active
Last Activity: March 09, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 17, 2026
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
Main Document: ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#2
Feb 17, 2026
Appear Pro Hac Vice (for Attorney filers only, Credit Card required)
Main Document: Appear Pro Hac Vice (for Attorney filers only, Credit Card required)
#3
Feb 17, 2026
Case Management Order
Main Document: Case Management Order
Feb 17, 2026
Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand added. (jd)
Feb 17, 2026
CLERK'S REQUEST FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION re 2 MOTION for attorney TONY SANGIAMO to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-9366924). ERROR: Filer did not attach a Proposed Order as required by LCvR 7. CORRECTION: Filer to submit a proposed order using the Proposed Order event. Filer is to link the Proposed Order to the relevant motion in the event.ADDITIONALY, Party did not file a Certificate of Good Standing as required by LCvR 83.2(B) PRO HAC VICE ADMISSIONS. Party advised to file a Certificate of Good Standing using the ERRATA event and linking to the Motion for Pro Hac. (jd)
#4
Feb 18, 2026
Errata re 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by TONY SANTO SANGIAMO. Reason for Correction: LACK OF CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING. (Sangiamo, Tony) (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Main Document: Errata
#5
Feb 18, 2026
Proposed Order re 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by TONY SANTO SANGIAMO. (Sangiamo, Tony) (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Main Document: Proposed
#6
Feb 19, 2026
ORDER granting 2 Motion for TONY SANGIAMO to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/19/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (drc) (Entered: 02/19/2026)
#7
Feb 19, 2026
CERTIFICATE of Compliance re 3 Case Management Order, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus CERTIFYING SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ON ALL RESPONDENTS by Tony Sangiamo on behalf of SEBASTHIAN ENRIQUE DIEZ CANSECO (Sangiamo, Tony) (Entered: 02/19/2026)
Main Document: CERTIFICATE
Feb 19, 2026
Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
#8
Feb 20, 2026
CERTIFICATE of Compliance re 3 Case Management Order, 7 Certificate of Compliance, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus AMENDED NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Tony Sangiamo on behalf of SEBASTHIAN ENRIQUE DIEZ CANSECO (Sangiamo, Tony) (Entered: 02/20/2026)
Main Document: CERTIFICATE
#9
Feb 25, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Jerome A. Moschetta on behalf of PAM BONDI, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER. (Moschetta, Jerome) (Entered: 02/25/2026)
Main Document: NOTICE
#10
Feb 25, 2026
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by PAM BONDI, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER. (Moschetta, Jerome) (Entered: 02/25/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT
#11
Feb 26, 2026
ORDER AMENDING 3 Case Management Order. The Court has reviewed the Petition and supporting materials, and finds that the threshold issue concerns whether Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing because he is subject to discretionary detention pursuant to §1226(a) as opposed to mandatory detention pursuant to §1225(b). Based on its prior decisions on this issue, including Gbamoi v. Oddo et al., Civil Action No. 26-cv-108-CCW, ECF No. 10 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2026) and Orellana Rivas v. Oddo et al., Civil Action No. 26-cv-246-CCW, ECF No. 8 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2026), the Court tentatively intends to grant the Petition to the extent it requests a bond hearing. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 3 Case Management Order provisions regarding the timing and substance of Respondents' Response to the Petition are amended as follows: If Respondents believe that there are factual or legal differences between this case and the other cases in which the Court has decided the issue, then they shall file a response to the Petition on or before 3/5/26. Responses are limited to 25 pages, double-spaced. If Respondents' positions are the same as in the prior cases in which this issue has been raised and decided by the Court, they shall simply state as much in the 3/5/26 response, cite to any response or brief previously filed on the issue in this Court, and their positions shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the provision of the 3 Case Management Order setting a 30 day response time period is hereby VACATED. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/26/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjw) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Feb 26, 2026
Order AND Order
Feb 26, 2026
Order
#13
Mar 09, 2026
Order
Main Document: Order
#14
Mar 09, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Main Document: Judgment (Rule 58)