Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01277
(HC) Flores Arbizu v. Chestnut
Completed
Case Information
Filed: February 13, 2026
Assigned to:
Jennifer L. Thurston
Referred to:
Erin Guy Castillo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: March 17, 2026
Last Activity:
June 16, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Feb 13, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Respondants by Osman Mijail Flores Arbizu. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12903551) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lal, Prerna) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Feb 13, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Osman Mijail Flores Arbizu. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Notice, # 3 Declaration, # 4 Declaration, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Proposed Order)(Lal, Prerna) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Feb 13, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/19/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk VLC) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#5
Feb 13, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) The Court has reviewed the Petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) and the related request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 2). Petitioner asserts that he has been detained since October 30, 2025 (Doc. 2-1 at 2), more than 4 months ago. He does not explain his delay in seeking his request for a temporary restraining order or why despite this delay, the Court should treat the situation as an emergency. Thus, the TRO request is untimely, and it is DENIED. Local Rule 231(b). The Court refers the matter to the assigned magistrate judge for a determination on the merits. The Court sets the following briefing schedule, which may be modified by the magistrate judge as needed. Respondents SHALL file their responsive pleading within 30 days. Petitioner may file a traverse no later than 15 days after the respondents file their brief.In the meantime, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that Respondents shall not remove Petitioner from the United States nor transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the circumstances, the Court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and any subsequent order and finds that Petitioner has satisfied the factors governing the issuance of such relief signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on February 13, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
#6
Feb 13, 2026
MOTION for RECONSIDERATION re 5 Order on Motion for TRO,,,,,, by Osman Mijail Flores Arbizu. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Lal, Prerna) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
Reconsideration
#7
Feb 13, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Cody S. Chapple for Pamela Bondi,Cody S. Chapple for Christopher Chestnut,Cody S. Chapple for Polly Kaiser,Cody S. Chapple for Todd M. Lyons,Cody S. Chapple for Kristi Noem (Chapple, Cody) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#8
Feb 13, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#9
Feb 13, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/13/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
Feb 13, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
#10
Feb 23, 2026
Preliminary Injunction
Main Document:
Preliminary Injunction
#11
Feb 24, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) On February 13, 2026, the Court denied Petitioner's request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 2 ) because he had already been in detention for four months prior to the filing of the motion. (Doc. 5, citing Local Rule 231(b).) That same day, Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of that denial. (Doc. 6 .) Among other things, Petitioner argues that he should not be punished for exhausting administrative remedies before bringing this petition or for Counsel's workload. (Doc. 6 at 2 (indicating Petitioner requested a bond hearing "the moment it became available to him").) Counsel fails to appreciate that the challenged portion of the Court's order addresses only the question of whether Petitioner's detention status should be addressed on shortened time (i.e., as a procedural emergency). Eastern District of California Local Rule 231(b) permits the Court to consider "whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Nothing in the request for reconsideration causes the Court to question its prior determination that the issues raised here--no matter their merit--could have been brought earlier by way of a regularly scheduled motion. Nor is the fact that a state court trial is scheduled for March 13, 2026 in his 2024 misdemeanor case, as nothing precludes Petitioner from requesting a continuance of that matter. The procedural situation faced by Petitioner is common to the many others who have sought immigration-related habeas relief from this Court in recent months-at the rate of several dozen each week. Petitioner's request is, in effect, an attempt to jump the line ahead of similarly situated individuals. For all these reasons, the request for reconsideration is DENIED. Petitioner has also filed a request for a preliminary injunction. (Doc. 10 .) That motion is referred to the assigned magistrate judge who is free to take appropriate action to avoid duplication of effort signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on February 24, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
Feb 24, 2026
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
#12
Mar 13, 2026
RESPONSE by Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Polly Kaiser, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Chapple, Cody) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#13
Mar 14, 2026
RESPONSE by Osman Mijail Flores Arbizu to 12 Response. (Lal, Prerna) (Entered: 03/14/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#14
Mar 17, 2026
Order Dismissing Case AND Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
#15
Mar 17, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
#16
Jun 15, 2026
Attorney Fees
Main Document:
Attorney Fees
#17
Jun 16, 2026
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Erin Guy Castillo. The new case number is: 1:26-cv-01277-JLT-EGC. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 06/16/2026)
#18
Jun 16, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Guy Castillo on 6/16/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed petitioner's "MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES by Osman Mijail Flores Arbizu." (Doc. 16 .) The motion hearing set for 7/22/2026 is VACATED. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), after briefing is concluded, the motion will be deemed submitted on the papers and a written decision will issue. (Deputy Clerk WAK) (Entered: 06/16/2026)
Jun 16, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm