Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01218

#1

Feb 12, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Minga Wofford by Aidyn Sadykov. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12895329) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - Immigration Documents)(Shah, Nilima) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

#2

Feb 12, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/19/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk PAA) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

#3

Feb 12, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Ihsan U. Ahmed for Sergio Albarran,Ihsan U. Ahmed for Pamela Bondi,Ihsan U. Ahmed for Todd Lyons,Ihsan U. Ahmed for Kristi Noem,Ihsan U. Ahmed for Minga Wofford (Ahmed, Ihsan) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

#4

Feb 12, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

#5

Feb 12, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

#6

Feb 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/13/2026: The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because Petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, Respondent is directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return on or before February 20, 2026. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return on or before February 27, 2026. (Text Only Entry), (Filing Deadline: 2/20/2026 ) (Deputy Clerk JLP) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

Feb 13, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#7

Feb 20, 2026

Dismiss

#8

Feb 20, 2026

Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

#9

Feb 27, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#10

Feb 27, 2026

REPLY by Aidyn Sadykov re 8 Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,. (Shah, Nilima) (Entered: 02/27/2026)

#11

May 13, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#12

May 14, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/14/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 5/18/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 5/19/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 05/14/2026)

May 14, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings